Take a photo of a barcode or cover
shereadytoread's Reviews (824)
This was such a fun story but honestly too short for the set up. There are magical elements plus fake dating plus insta-love was too many things for the length of the novella. I enjoyed the characters and premise a lot, but it was too packed.
Not rating this one as I DNFd the first book and it seems like a lot of this book is based in things that happened during that story so it was a bit confusing to read. I wasn’t aware they were related when I picked it up.
Graphic: Sexual assault
dark
emotional
mysterious
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Complicated
As we follow Calliope's story, we get a sense of mystery but we are unsure who to truly trust. This operates as an effective YA thriller with a few drawbacks.
Pros:
- Plot and subplot that work well together
- the secret society inner workings make for a really interesting conflict
- normal life is not ignored while all these plot twists are happening
- the setting of the school works really well with allowing for the freedom of the plot, but not being unrealistic in what can happen for teen protagonists
Cons
- Too many reveals in the 3rd act. There are 4 or 5 major plot twists (depending on your definition of plot twist vs plot point) that all come into play within two or three short chapters
- One of the plot twists really undoes the stakes of the 2nd act
Pros:
- Plot and subplot that work well together
- the secret society inner workings make for a really interesting conflict
- normal life is not ignored while all these plot twists are happening
- the setting of the school works really well with allowing for the freedom of the plot, but not being unrealistic in what can happen for teen protagonists
Cons
- Too many reveals in the 3rd act. There are 4 or 5 major plot twists (depending on your definition of plot twist vs plot point) that all come into play within two or three short chapters
- One of the plot twists really undoes the stakes of the 2nd act
This was a bit too much of a slow burn. The large majority of the book includes no romance between the main characters. I love the idea of fated lovers meeting again but it was executed like a weird friendship while the FMC is in another situation for most of the book.
adventurous
challenging
reflective
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
This was an excellent YA fantasy retelling. The fairytale elements combined with an adventure quest melded well. Our main character is likable but flawed, and was written with a good amount of growth and depth. The supporting cast, all tasked with a seemingly impossible situation, made difficult choices with a lot of different perspectives that made the world feel fleshed out.
It had great queer representation, lessons on empowering yourself and others plus a really fun plot.
It had great queer representation, lessons on empowering yourself and others plus a really fun plot.
dark
Overall this was a solid story with good stakes. I would say the first half is more of a mystery and the second half is more crime thriller. I enjoyed that all the characters were morally grey so it isn’t as much of rooting for the characters to succeed, but more the larger revenge story and wanting the big bad to go down!
I thought the characters all had interesting depth to them (even if it didn’t make them “good guys”). One thing I appreciated was that the violence didn’t seem gratuitous and served a purpose in the book. The book is definitely DARK but it doesn’t play for shock value.
Disclaimer: I received a gifted ARC. All thoughts are my own.
I thought the characters all had interesting depth to them (even if it didn’t make them “good guys”). One thing I appreciated was that the violence didn’t seem gratuitous and served a purpose in the book. The book is definitely DARK but it doesn’t play for shock value.
Disclaimer: I received a gifted ARC. All thoughts are my own.
Graphic: Violence
Moderate: Pedophilia, Sexual assault, Trafficking
I think it was a bit repetitive but well researched. It gave a good amount of empirical information that was well balanced with personal stories. A bit more religious than expected (I wasn’t aware he was a pastor going in) but it wasn’t too much of a focus and mostly just part of his personal story mentioned towards the end.
Withholding reviews at the request of the union due to the HCP Union Strike
This book seemed more like adding elements for shock value sake, rather than pushing the plot forward but my main issues were:
1. Pathologizing female m*sturbation: It was presented as part of the MC's pathology, and not as an absolutely normal occurrence for young women. This is overdone in media where the same subject for boys is presented as normal and often comedic.
2. EXTREMELY poor mental health rep: The author doesn't even name the mental illness. That indicates to me that she wanted to pick and choose symptoms that fit the story, rather than actual representation of mental health issues in the MC. The story presents a method of self-h*rm that is again based in shock value.
3. The FMC doesn't consider SA to be a violent crime and even argues with the MMC about being self-righteous when he states that a group of football plays SAing a young drunk girl was a violent crime because she thinks women consent even if they are intoxicated.
Once I found out who the killer was (someone else told me after I DNFed), I couldn't believe that it was the one person I thought "no way" because it is so OBVIOUS and overdone the entire time that I assumed it had to be a red herring. Glad I didn't waste the rest of my time.
1. Pathologizing female m*sturbation: It was presented as part of the MC's pathology, and not as an absolutely normal occurrence for young women. This is overdone in media where the same subject for boys is presented as normal and often comedic.
2. EXTREMELY poor mental health rep: The author doesn't even name the mental illness. That indicates to me that she wanted to pick and choose symptoms that fit the story, rather than actual representation of mental health issues in the MC. The story presents a method of self-h*rm that is again based in shock value.
3. The FMC doesn't consider SA to be a violent crime and even argues with the MMC about being self-righteous when he states that a group of football plays SAing a young drunk girl was a violent crime because she thinks women consent even if they are intoxicated.
Once I found out who the killer was (someone else told me after I DNFed), I couldn't believe that it was the one person I thought "no way" because it is so OBVIOUS and overdone the entire time that I assumed it had to be a red herring. Glad I didn't waste the rest of my time.