Scan barcode
A review by erikars
Reconciliation: Islam, Democracy, and the West by Benazir Bhutto
3.0
In the end, this is kind of a two star book that gets an extra star because it contains a first hand account of the some of Pakistan's struggles with democracy.
In this book Bhutto -- who was assassinated not long after she returned to Pakistan and shortly after the book was completed -- tries to do many things. She gives an Quranic exegesis of why Islam and democracy are compatible despite the claims of extremists, she shares a personal account of her role in Pakistan's struggle for democracy, she gives a history of Pakistan, she takes us on a whirlwind tour of democracy in Muslim nations, and she presents her case for taking a stance for reconciliation between Western and Muslim nations and rejecting the Clash of Civilizations view of the relationship between Islam and the West.
Bhutto's exegesis is fairly successful in so far as it is sufficient to show that the Quran, like the Bible, can be interpreted in many ways. She did not convince me that the Quran was being misused to to justify violence anymore than I am convinced by progressive Christians that the Bible can't be used to justify any number of horrible things. However, she did convince me that it could also be used to justify a worldview that supported equality, democracy, and modernization. (When you don't believe these books come from a divine source, you don't get so caught up on their plurality of perspective.)
The other part of the book that is successful is where she is presenting her role in Pakistan's history as a memoir. Her account of the first attempt on her life the night of her final return to Pakistan was particularly compelling. When she switches to broader themes, it's clear that she is presenting a biased case -- not an unfairly biased case, but biased in the way that politicians always emphasize the themes that align with their goals.
Overall, I'm glad I read this, because I did learn a lot. But sadly -- and likely because of time and political pressure -- this book did not have the opportunity to grow into what it was attempting to be.
In this book Bhutto -- who was assassinated not long after she returned to Pakistan and shortly after the book was completed -- tries to do many things. She gives an Quranic exegesis of why Islam and democracy are compatible despite the claims of extremists, she shares a personal account of her role in Pakistan's struggle for democracy, she gives a history of Pakistan, she takes us on a whirlwind tour of democracy in Muslim nations, and she presents her case for taking a stance for reconciliation between Western and Muslim nations and rejecting the Clash of Civilizations view of the relationship between Islam and the West.
Bhutto's exegesis is fairly successful in so far as it is sufficient to show that the Quran, like the Bible, can be interpreted in many ways. She did not convince me that the Quran was being misused to to justify violence anymore than I am convinced by progressive Christians that the Bible can't be used to justify any number of horrible things. However, she did convince me that it could also be used to justify a worldview that supported equality, democracy, and modernization. (When you don't believe these books come from a divine source, you don't get so caught up on their plurality of perspective.)
The other part of the book that is successful is where she is presenting her role in Pakistan's history as a memoir. Her account of the first attempt on her life the night of her final return to Pakistan was particularly compelling. When she switches to broader themes, it's clear that she is presenting a biased case -- not an unfairly biased case, but biased in the way that politicians always emphasize the themes that align with their goals.
Overall, I'm glad I read this, because I did learn a lot. But sadly -- and likely because of time and political pressure -- this book did not have the opportunity to grow into what it was attempting to be.