Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.22 AVERAGE
3.22 AVERAGE
A fun (short) story - will look for other tales by these 2 and Bombo's other adventure
This is by no means a grand work of literature, but it was a lot of of fun to read. I liked the dry humor, as well as how each of the two authors in the book sort of represent the different "camps" of bookworms. It was entertaining to see appearances of famous authors and have the heroes try to figure out what books they were trapped in. Nerdy good time!
This is definitely a guilty pleasure. The audible version is quite entertaining. I'd highly recommend it.
Oh…kay.
First off, I sincerely hope the authors are (or, you know, were) VERY good friends with "NYTbestsellingauthorHughHowey". Actually, I would harbor a strong suspicion that one (or both) of the authors IS Hugh Howey … except … I loved Wool. I didn't love this.
See, there is a rather large difference between "trying to be funny" and "being funny". This I realized in spades while listening to Ben Aaronovitch's [b:Foxglove Summer|20499240|Foxglove Summer (Peter Grant, #5)|Ben Aaronovitch|https://d2arxad8u2l0g7.cloudfront.net/books/1402338677s/20499240.jpg|34142449], which, while not constructed as a comic novel, made me laugh out loud quite often, seemingly without even trying. Legendarium tried very, very hard – so hard – but … I did more cringing than anything.
Why use Hugh Howey's name and then change "Wool" to "Cotton"? What's the point? Is that supposed to be funny?
The writing was awkward, with the same word sometimes awkwardly being used in the same sentence. (See what I did there?) The plot made me think of nothing so much as a handful of spaghetti. It's an unoriginal idea done badly. The tone was juvenile. Not the content or the story – I don't mean that this was a book suitable for or meant for children, not if any parents have any sense. No, I mean that the authors' mindset seemed to be that of 13-year-old boys. I found it shocking that there were no details about toilet functions in the lifepod.
Worst of all, though, is the fact that the two main characters are complete and utter idiots. I have a hard time enjoying a book – like Wuthering Heights – in which there isn't a character I can like. I'm even less likely to enjoy a book in which I'm expected to spend time with idiots; I don't have much patience for fools in any setting, fictional or nonfictional. But – ok, the two "heroes" are completely annoying morons, and they utterly failed in their first mission. But here's the thing: how could they possibly not fail? How is it possible to successfully complete a mission when not only do you not know what the parameters of said mission are, but you don't even know there IS a mission? In plain spoilerese, they had no way of knowing they ought to snatch up some borogroves – and, moreover, had no way of knowing what the damn things were. So. Yeah. They failed. Yeah, they were idiots not to say "Hm – sword on a spaceship. Let's grab it, just in case ", but there's no contesting the fact that they're idiots.
If I never hear the word "doughnut" again, I'll be just as happy.
First off, I sincerely hope the authors are (or, you know, were) VERY good friends with "NYTbestsellingauthorHughHowey". Actually, I would harbor a strong suspicion that one (or both) of the authors IS Hugh Howey … except … I loved Wool. I didn't love this.
See, there is a rather large difference between "trying to be funny" and "being funny". This I realized in spades while listening to Ben Aaronovitch's [b:Foxglove Summer|20499240|Foxglove Summer (Peter Grant, #5)|Ben Aaronovitch|https://d2arxad8u2l0g7.cloudfront.net/books/1402338677s/20499240.jpg|34142449], which, while not constructed as a comic novel, made me laugh out loud quite often, seemingly without even trying. Legendarium tried very, very hard – so hard – but … I did more cringing than anything.
Why use Hugh Howey's name and then change "Wool" to "Cotton"? What's the point? Is that supposed to be funny?
The writing was awkward, with the same word sometimes awkwardly being used in the same sentence. (See what I did there?) The plot made me think of nothing so much as a handful of spaghetti. It's an unoriginal idea done badly. The tone was juvenile. Not the content or the story – I don't mean that this was a book suitable for or meant for children, not if any parents have any sense. No, I mean that the authors' mindset seemed to be that of 13-year-old boys. I found it shocking that there were no details about toilet functions in the lifepod.
Worst of all, though, is the fact that the two main characters are complete and utter idiots. I have a hard time enjoying a book – like Wuthering Heights – in which there isn't a character I can like. I'm even less likely to enjoy a book in which I'm expected to spend time with idiots; I don't have much patience for fools in any setting, fictional or nonfictional. But – ok, the two "heroes" are completely annoying morons, and they utterly failed in their first mission. But here's the thing: how could they possibly not fail? How is it possible to successfully complete a mission when not only do you not know what the parameters of said mission are, but you don't even know there IS a mission? In plain spoilerese, they had no way of knowing they ought to snatch up some borogroves – and, moreover, had no way of knowing what the damn things were. So. Yeah. They failed. Yeah, they were idiots not to say "Hm – sword on a spaceship. Let's grab it, just in case ", but there's no contesting the fact that they're idiots.
If I never hear the word "doughnut" again, I'll be just as happy.
The style of this book reminded me of Robert A. Heinlein, but with less quality of writing and less deeper thoughts. As with Heinlein's stories, there is a quirky humor and since of general fun adventure, but again as with Heinlein, eventually the characters begin to drag the story down. I thought the concept of this book was interesting and I love the idea of it, but I thought it was poorly executed. I wouldn't say this book is horrid or anything, just not what I like in a science fiction story.
So much fun - I love Bobo and Alastair! And opening the story with the great author Hugh Howey? Priceless. Would recommend this story to anyone who thinks that a tongue-in-cheek romp through some of the most revered novels in the Western canon sounds like a good way to spend a few hours.
I got this a couple of weeks ago as an Audible Daily Deal, but just now got around to listening it. I had not read its predecessor, [b:Hugh Howey Must Die|17338157|#NaNoWri War Z, Hugh Howey Must Die|Michael Bunker|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1360712065s/17338157.jpg|24072003], but the reviews were pretty good and I occasionally enjoy a light, funny read. I don't think that the concept was that original, and the execution was just okay (I felt the story was starting to get worn around Hemingway and was disintegrating by Melville), but the laughs worked for me. As an occasional unrepentant one-star reviewer, Foley had me howling with laughter--"syphilitic." I have to say that my vicious reviewing isn't a result of being a frustrated unpublished writer; I think it's sometimes okay to call a steaming pile of crap what it is. Still, this was not crap, and if you're looking for a whirlwind tour through a humorously-depicted literary fantasyland, I recommend this one.