Scan barcode
justinkhchen's review against another edition
3.0
3 stars
Alfred Hitchcock's Rear Window with a 90s tech spin; while it brings to the table compelling exploration on voyeurism, television culture, and make-believe, It's also oddly shallow and under-cooked, resulting in a thriller that entertains, but comes up short of its full potential.
Briefly on the butchered 1993 film adaptation (which was what brought me reading the book in the first place): The film maintains the same cast of character and the basic framework (a high-rise apartment in New York City with a less than desirable track record), but tells a heavily altered, all together different whodunit plot line. Still, to give credit where credit is due, the casting of Sharon Stone and William Baldwin is spot-on, and the film does a great job bringing the environment to life (the high-rise looks impeccable); so maybe watch a trailer if you're interested in reading, just to gain some visual references.
The lack of correlation between the two versions kept the reading fresh; the novel dives in deeper into the concept of 'watching'—from something that is made to be consumed (television and publishing), to something that is considered unacceptable conduct (voyeurism). Ira Levin is not afraid to push some characters into morally gray territory, and conjures up interesting circumstance on privacy and innate curiosity. The novel is ultimately a study on media consumption, and even a little ahead of its time with some of the characters' 'binge' behavior.
As much as I'm fascinated by the subject matter it's exploring, Sliver under-delivers as a thriller; the plot, while never boring, takes too long to set up, and the thrill barely has time to land its punches, before the short book ends on an out-of-left-field climax/closure. While definitely more coherent compares to its cinema counterpart, I can see why the filmmaker decided to rewrite the story from the ground up; the book feels a little aimless, like it has yet figured out just what is the story it wants to tell. Which is rather ironic, because the heroine is literally a publishing editor specializes in thrillers and Gothics.
You can tell Sliver is written by a seasoned master, with its lean and razor-sharp writing, and clever juxtaposition of ideas and concepts. It's too bad it also feels abandoned, like Ira Levin simply lost interest after the first draft. To conclude my own journey with Sliver: yes, the book is better, but only marginally so.
Alfred Hitchcock's Rear Window with a 90s tech spin; while it brings to the table compelling exploration on voyeurism, television culture, and make-believe, It's also oddly shallow and under-cooked, resulting in a thriller that entertains, but comes up short of its full potential.
Briefly on the butchered 1993 film adaptation (which was what brought me reading the book in the first place): The film maintains the same cast of character and the basic framework (a high-rise apartment in New York City with a less than desirable track record), but tells a heavily altered, all together different whodunit plot line. Still, to give credit where credit is due, the casting of Sharon Stone and William Baldwin is spot-on, and the film does a great job bringing the environment to life (the high-rise looks impeccable); so maybe watch a trailer if you're interested in reading, just to gain some visual references.
The lack of correlation between the two versions kept the reading fresh; the novel dives in deeper into the concept of 'watching'—from something that is made to be consumed (television and publishing), to something that is considered unacceptable conduct (voyeurism). Ira Levin is not afraid to push some characters into morally gray territory, and conjures up interesting circumstance on privacy and innate curiosity. The novel is ultimately a study on media consumption, and even a little ahead of its time with some of the characters' 'binge' behavior.
As much as I'm fascinated by the subject matter it's exploring, Sliver under-delivers as a thriller; the plot, while never boring, takes too long to set up, and the thrill barely has time to land its punches, before the short book ends on an out-of-left-field climax/closure. While definitely more coherent compares to its cinema counterpart, I can see why the filmmaker decided to rewrite the story from the ground up; the book feels a little aimless, like it has yet figured out just what is the story it wants to tell. Which is rather ironic, because the heroine is literally a publishing editor specializes in thrillers and Gothics.
You can tell Sliver is written by a seasoned master, with its lean and razor-sharp writing, and clever juxtaposition of ideas and concepts. It's too bad it also feels abandoned, like Ira Levin simply lost interest after the first draft. To conclude my own journey with Sliver: yes, the book is better, but only marginally so.
thefullbronte's review against another edition
1.0
Review Haiku:
The film was awful,
How could this be even worse?
Yet somehow it is.
The film was awful,
How could this be even worse?
Yet somehow it is.
kaylynritke's review against another edition
mysterious
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
_p0ssum_'s review
I found this book extremely boring and decpite it having a strong interesting summary it didn't keep me interested at all . It's a shame that an interesting idea like this went to waste.
theboldbookworm's review against another edition
3.0
I liked this book. I'm sure it was a much better book at the time it was written with the whole secret surveillance trope, but I think it stood up to the passage of time well enough. That kind of thing is still creepy even if is happening much more often. I'm not big on romance, but there definitely wasn't as much sex as the promise of an erotic thriller led me to believe there would be. This is a decent little thriller that passed the time well enough and Felice is definitely my favorite character.
kylederose's review against another edition
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
1.0
chuckyinspace's review against another edition
dark
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
dcrice's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
Writing was a bit hard to follow at times. Bit interesting characters and plot. Ending although far fetched seemed to suit this novel.