Reviews

I consolatori by Muriel Spark

hfjarmer's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny lighthearted mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

 I have a fondness for books from this time period as they often exude whimsical and playful tones, providing a refreshing change of pace from my usual modern reads. While I hesitate to draw direct comparisons, I couldn't help but notice vague similarities in writing style and storytelling between this book and Edith Wharton's "The Age of Innocence," despite their very different plots.

"The Comforters" was presented to me as a story where a woman gradually realizes she is a character in a novel. Intrigued by this premise, I must admit I was somewhat underwhelmed as I had hoped for a more substantial execution.

Instead, the narrative unfolds as a mystery involving Laurence who suspects his grandmother's involvement in a gang, leading us through a series of intertwined storylines until the mystery is unraveled. The aspect of the woman realizing she's in a novel plays a minor role, leaving me feeling that the book could have maintained its essence even without this angle, resembling a chaotic rendition of the "it was all a dream" trope.

There is some pretty blatant homophobia in this novel as well, I suppose more a product of the time period in which it was written. The portrayal of homosexual characters borders on caricature, almost comically exaggerated and I feel like those of you that know my heart can guess what I mean by that.

Despite its convoluted narrative, "The Comforters" remains an entertaining and silly read. I am intrigued to explore more of Muriel Spark's works, as her unique voice shines through despite the disjointed storytelling. 

bethanyceinwen's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

archerisonline's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny lighthearted reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
read this for my uni course and was pleasantly surprised!! i think it starts really strong and loses some momentum, but the ending is great. witty and one of a kind. a little dry! a little boring at times! but overall enjoyable.

nayana20's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

btkeyes's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny mysterious

4.0

miles_151's review against another edition

Go to review page

lighthearted mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

kinda crazy. idrk what to say about this book cos I still am not entirely sure what's going on but it was a little bit mind boggling and I love it for that

lostintime_73's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.0

It was made to sound so interesting but, and i may not have looked into reviews enough, they hardly touched on the idea of her being haunted by the author. By the end, I feel like it was almost forgotten. The characters were boring and flat or just grim. It just dragged, in my opinion, and I just didn't understand it

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

zoekyriacou's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This is original, thought provoking and has a dry wit which I found very amusing. I think it is an interesting and explicit exploration of themes of madness, religion, authorship and free-will. The novel is most engaging to me when Caroline is at the forefront. However, I was inattentive to the intricacies of the mystery plot. Expect much repetition and intentional mundanity and hackneyed tropes- as meta fiction it is a scathing satire on conventional realism. I am enjoying analysing this book for university, but don’t know how much I would enjoy it as a reading for pleasure book?

hrlukz's review against another edition

Go to review page

I think I shall review this like an old man writing a film review for the guardian and say it was RIOTOUSLY GOOD FUN

coupes's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny lighthearted mysterious reflective relaxing medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75