Scan barcode
rebelbelle13's review
adventurous
challenging
dark
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.25
If you ever wondered what would happen if someone decided to write a Doctor Who novel based on a scholarly paper on theoretical physics, I would point you to The Taking of Planet 5. If the theory of predator universes and "swimmers" wasn't complicated enough, the authors throw in multiple character perspectives, Time Lords from different eras in wildly differing bodies, and wrap the whole package in a Lovecraftian homage. I had to read every line of this novel, very carefully, to even begin to grasp the concepts and goings on.
That's not to say there aren't some great moments here- the Doctor plays a key part and at one point leads an army of slave Tardises to destroy a universe, Compassion finally comes into her own- rather like Ripley from Alien, and Fitz is slowly gaining more confidence and composure, and even plays a pivotal role in the finale.
The complicated nature of the story will probably turn casual readers of Who off. The villain monologue alone had my head swimming. As it stands, it's a fine addition to the Whoniverse, if a little pompous. Side note: I tried to find Bucher-Jones' paper on cosmo-biology that was quoted in the annexe. If anyone has a line on that, could they send it my way? I'd be interested in taking a look at it.
For those who have not read this novel yet, I actually encourage you to read the annexe first- it might help unravel the complicated nature and themes for you as you read the narrative itself.
That's not to say there aren't some great moments here- the Doctor plays a key part and at one point leads an army of slave Tardises to destroy a universe, Compassion finally comes into her own- rather like Ripley from Alien, and Fitz is slowly gaining more confidence and composure, and even plays a pivotal role in the finale.
The complicated nature of the story will probably turn casual readers of Who off. The villain monologue alone had my head swimming. As it stands, it's a fine addition to the Whoniverse, if a little pompous. Side note: I tried to find Bucher-Jones' paper on cosmo-biology that was quoted in the annexe. If anyone has a line on that, could they send it my way? I'd be interested in taking a look at it.
For those who have not read this novel yet, I actually encourage you to read the annexe first- it might help unravel the complicated nature and themes for you as you read the narrative itself.
lovel's review
adventurous
mysterious
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.25
caedocyon's review
3.0
Not bad considering this is an officially-sanctioned and entirely shameless Doctor Who/Lovecraft crossover.
My main complaint is that I just finished [b:Doctor Who: Interference - Book One|882649|Doctor Who Interference - Book One|Lawrence Miles|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1179170543s/882649.jpg|867926], which is queer-ly casual about gender. For instance, it contains this slightly infamous exchange:
‘Can I ask you something personal?’ he [the Doctor] said.
I.M. Foreman nodded. ‘I warn you, though. If it’s anything to do with how I got this body, the details are going to be messy. You’ve never been a woman, have you?’
‘I’m not sure I’ve ever even been a man. That’s not what I was going to ask.’
In Taking of Planet Five on the other hand, every alien has a somehow obvious and ineffable binary gender, even the Elder Things! Even the fucking TARDISes!!! There is absolutely no excuse for giving a bunch of spacetime machines human binary genders and a herd/harem structure with a dominant "bull." WHY.
My main complaint is that I just finished [b:Doctor Who: Interference - Book One|882649|Doctor Who Interference - Book One|Lawrence Miles|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1179170543s/882649.jpg|867926], which is queer-ly casual about gender. For instance, it contains this slightly infamous exchange:
‘Can I ask you something personal?’ he [the Doctor] said.
I.M. Foreman nodded. ‘I warn you, though. If it’s anything to do with how I got this body, the details are going to be messy. You’ve never been a woman, have you?’
‘I’m not sure I’ve ever even been a man. That’s not what I was going to ask.’
In Taking of Planet Five on the other hand, every alien has a somehow obvious and ineffable binary gender, even the Elder Things! Even the fucking TARDISes!!! There is absolutely no excuse for giving a bunch of spacetime machines human binary genders and a herd/harem structure with a dominant "bull." WHY.
More...