sparklingreader's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Thoughts: This was definitely not what I was expecting. It was much more. First of all, it’s a thriller, not a cozy mystery. The main character, Theo, sometimes comes across as naïve and meek, but by the end, she has grown into a stronger person. I loved the character of Mac, and Gus wasn’t too bad either. And the dog, Horse, was adorable. The plot was at times a little confusing, but did work out in the end. In fact, the end surprised me a little, but in a very good way. It’s definitely not the kind of work I usually read, but I’m glad I did. It was very different and intriguing.

Recommendation: Recommended.

Disclaimer: Disclosure of Material: I received a final and/or advanced reader copy of this book with the hope that I will leave my unbiased opinion. I was not required to leave a review, positive or otherwise, and my opinions are just that… My Opinions. I am posting this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising”

thegirlwitheaquaribbons's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I requested this books cause of 3 reasons: the cover, the title and the description. I thought It would be a supper sweet novel about a writer, but it wasn’t. It was a shocking thriller written by the master of Suspense. I love books where the main character is a writer(Little Women, for example) and The Mystery Writer isn’t an exception. It was very inspirational for me while writing my YA thriller, Golden Keys, about a writer that researches the “death” of her father’s. Very good and brilliant. 5 out of 5.

tris111's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

2.5 Stars

selfmeaning's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

🦋The mystery writer

When Theodosia Benton abandons her career path as an attorney and shows up on her brother's doorstep with two suitcases and an unfinished novel, she expects to face a few challenges. Will her brother support her ambition or send her back to finish her degree? What will her parents say when they learn of her decision? Does she even have what it takes to be a successful writer?
What Theo never expects is to be drawn into a hidden literary world in which identity is something that can be lost and remade for the sake of an audience.

I’ve never read from this author but I’ll be sure to read again from her because her writing is amazing.

The book starts with a romance then it becomes a murder mystery while it develops another romance.

I loved that the book didn’t focus on the romance but on who did it? Who killed Dan Murdoch? And the peculiar of it was that it was made to keep you hook so it doesn’t let you rest so you have to find out. 

It all comes down to unmarking someone who had put on a mask on everyone who readers are not waiting for. Then it comes the conspiracy theories. 

Thank you NetGalley for letting me read it in exchange for an honest review.

nadiamg_reads's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Thank you, NetGalley, for an advanced copy of The Mystery Writer in exchange for a review.

I’d give this 2.5 ⭐️ overall. The premise was interesting and unique, but there was somehow too much and not enough happening at the same time. I didn’t connect with any of the characters and had a hard time staying engaged.

In short, I really wanted to love the book based on its premise, but the execution of it was a miss for me.

justxis's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced

2.0

I had high expectations for this book, but unluckily it was just not my piece of cake. 

The plot seems interesting but nothing made me connect to the characters in any way, they seem kinda flat. Sometimes I felt a lack of details for the characters' development, but at the same time, I felt there were too many unnecessary details for the story. Maybe it was the opposite way I would ended up liking this book more. 

But I’m sure many people will enjoy “The Mystery Writer”! The twists are good, and the story is interesting. Just - again - not my type. 

Thank you NetGalley and Poisoned Pen Press for the opportunity to read this book in exchange for an honest review.

emrache's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I absolutely adored the Woman in the Library, so had really high hopes for this book as well. I enjoyed but not nearly as much as the other. That said, it was still ab entertaining and twisting ride.

Thanks to Netgalley for providing a free ARC in exchange for an honest review.

kerasalwaysreading's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

This was different. I love conspiracy theory stuff in fiction because it’s based so strongly in possibly conceptual truths.

When Theo abandons her law career path and turns to her brother for a place to stay, she decides that her unfinished novel is what she wants. So, she spends time in a coffee shop “writing”… There she meets Dan, a well known writer working in a manuscript of his own. The two form a swift friendship, which quickly turns romantic.

But, when Dan is found dead and his manuscript missing, things become stranger and stranger. Theo knows that she needs to learn more about Dan and is determined to do so.

This was good. I enjoyed the characters and the plot, but there was something missing for me, something that kept me from fully engaging with the story. It was a fun and interesting take on the rich and powerful and how far the reach goes.

joycerl's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I love mysteries and thrillers.This is a great collection of essays by mystery authors.Its a mixed bag,definitely not predictable.The essays are short so it keeps your interest.
Thankyou Netgalley for this arc

beautyfullperla's review

Go to review page

Not what I expected