Scan barcode
abmochapman's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
an incredible psychological thriller (apart from peter straub’s introduction, which — rather than introducing the novel — explains its entire plot)
Content Warnings
Graphic: Gaslighting, Misogyny, and Sexism
Moderate: Panic attacks/disorders
Minor: Vomit, Blood, Child death, and Racism
hookerkitty's review against another edition
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
1.0
…what in the hell did I just read? I borrowed this on Hoopla, so I’m not sure just how much was formatting errors from Hoopla or if it’s the actual book’s fault.
There was rarely any indication that there’d be a scene change between lines/paragraphs, which was hella confusing (once in a while I’d get a — between lines, or an extra space between lines, but the majority of the time I got neither).
I also had to keep checking to see if I accidentally skipped a page, because it’d seem like I was missing gaps of info. But judging by other reviews I’ve seen, that’s how the book was actually written. Which is atrocious. Especially when giant gaps take place at the end. There was no huge twist, you just have to decide for yourself what happened. Or, in the case of the edition I read with Peter Straub’s (awful) intro, you can basically read a quick summary/cliffs note version of the book, before you actually read any of it yet. Who the hell approved that‽
I’m glad this was a short book, because I would’ve been hella pissed wasting more time than I did (still irked even with it being shorter though). I’m SO glad I didn’t buy it in a whim to make sure I had the entire book.
I mean, just, why? I picked this book for one of my challenges, both because it fit, but mostly because Rosemary’s Baby wasn’t available to borrow on Libby or Hoopla. I’d always wanted to read Rosemary’s Baby, but now I’m questioning whether or not it’ll be worth my time because this was so bad. Argh.
There was rarely any indication that there’d be a scene change between lines/paragraphs, which was hella confusing (once in a while I’d get a — between lines, or an extra space between lines, but the majority of the time I got neither).
I also had to keep checking to see if I accidentally skipped a page, because it’d seem like I was missing gaps of info. But judging by other reviews I’ve seen, that’s how the book was actually written. Which is atrocious. Especially when giant gaps take place at the end. There was no huge twist, you just have to decide for yourself what happened. Or, in the case of the edition I read with Peter Straub’s (awful) intro, you can basically read a quick summary/cliffs note version of the book, before you actually read any of it yet. Who the hell approved that‽
I’m glad this was a short book, because I would’ve been hella pissed wasting more time than I did (still irked even with it being shorter though). I’m SO glad I didn’t buy it in a whim to make sure I had the entire book.
I mean, just, why? I picked this book for one of my challenges, both because it fit, but mostly because Rosemary’s Baby wasn’t available to borrow on Libby or Hoopla. I’d always wanted to read Rosemary’s Baby, but now I’m questioning whether or not it’ll be worth my time because this was so bad. Argh.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Misogyny and Sexism
Moderate: Gaslighting
Minor: Child death, Racism, Panic attacks/disorders, Vomit, and Sexual content
More...