Scan barcode
pantslint's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.25
The premise is still so relevant (sadly) and the language and mechanics still hold up pretty well, so I can see how this book is a timeless classic. However, it's interesting to see how far feminist theory and female characters have come—it's clear in Joanna's characterization.
When Joanna meets Carol in the very first chapter, she observes how beautiful Carol is, and how perfect of a housewife she is. But Joanna's attitude irks the hell out of me.
No, she didn't know how it was, thank God. Not to be like that, a compulsive hausfrau. Who could blame Ted for taking advantage of such an asking-to-be-exploited patsy?
I have to read more of Levin's work. And I don't think I'll watch Olivia Wilde's movie.
Graphic: Gaslighting, Misogyny, and Sexism
Moderate: Domestic abuse, Sexual content, and Murder
Minor: Racism and Blood
matchamarimo's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Misogyny, Gaslighting, and Sexism
Moderate: Sexual content and Racism
its_kievan's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
Palahniuk’s introduction is… more complicated. He’s a lot more coherent than in his recent works (looking at you, Adjustment Day), and he does cite My Personal Queen Susan Faludi, but for the intro to a feminist masterpiece (TM) it would have been more interesting to hear from a woman.
Moderate: Sexual content and Sexism
Minor: Blood and Racism
ju10ma's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Graphic: Sexism
Moderate: Gaslighting
hellsjerome's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Minor: Sexism
savshelfinger's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Gaslighting and Sexism
Moderate: Racism
greenan26's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Moderate: Sexism and Mental illness
abmochapman's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Gaslighting, Misogyny, and Sexism
Moderate: Panic attacks/disorders
Minor: Vomit, Blood, Child death, and Racism
hookerkitty's review against another edition
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
1.0
There was rarely any indication that there’d be a scene change between lines/paragraphs, which was hella confusing (once in a while I’d get a — between lines, or an extra space between lines, but the majority of the time I got neither).
I also had to keep checking to see if I accidentally skipped a page, because it’d seem like I was missing gaps of info. But judging by other reviews I’ve seen, that’s how the book was actually written. Which is atrocious. Especially when giant gaps take place at the end. There was no huge twist, you just have to decide for yourself what happened. Or, in the case of the edition I read with Peter Straub’s (awful) intro, you can basically read a quick summary/cliffs note version of the book, before you actually read any of it yet. Who the hell approved that‽
I’m glad this was a short book, because I would’ve been hella pissed wasting more time than I did (still irked even with it being shorter though). I’m SO glad I didn’t buy it in a whim to make sure I had the entire book.
I mean, just, why? I picked this book for one of my challenges, both because it fit, but mostly because Rosemary’s Baby wasn’t available to borrow on Libby or Hoopla. I’d always wanted to read Rosemary’s Baby, but now I’m questioning whether or not it’ll be worth my time because this was so bad. Argh.
Graphic: Misogyny and Sexism
Moderate: Gaslighting
Minor: Child death, Racism, Panic attacks/disorders, Vomit, and Sexual content
marageorge's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Graphic: Death, Misogyny, Toxic relationship, Gaslighting, Sexism, and Murder