Reviews

Life After Truth by Ceridwen Dovey

bianca89279's review

Go to review page

4.0

Life After Truth is about a group of five Harvard graduates and a long weekend spent together at Harvard for their fifteen-year graduation anniversary. They're in their late thirties. There's handsome, single Jomo, who's a purchaser of rare gemstones. Jules is a beautiful actress who's quite famous. Her best friend is Jomo. Then there's Eloise, who's a professor of hedonics at Harvard. Rowan and Marian are married with two under five girls. Rowan is a principal in a low socio-economic primary school. Marian is a stay-at-home mum dealing with the drudgeries and blessings of modern, unrelating parenting, with no outside help, except for Rowan who was the most loving partner and father.
The reunion is yet another opportunity to catch up and to compare and contrast. Wishing, what-ifs, old grudges, unfulfilled wishes and potential, having a meaningful life vs a comfortable one and many other issues that every adult experiences.
The son of the US president, who was in the same graduating year, is loathed by the five friends because he's father, the President, is very much like Trump.
The characters and their problems epitomise the middle class' modern life ups and downs, the search for meaning, the demands of parenting vs career, stability and affluence vs making a difference, and a whole lot of middle-class guilt. During the time spent celebrating their fifteenth's year anniversary, several things occur, some more dramatic than others.

Many of us will empathise, sympathise and relate to most characters in this contemporary novel.

misha_ali's review

Go to review page

2.0

I expected a murder mystery based on the blurb, but this is definitely not one.

I don't need to like characters, but I do need to find them interesting/compelling to follow their inner dialogue with any interest. The only characters I was interested in were Eloise and Binx.

The round-robin POV chapters works well for a lot of books interested in exploring the same or roughly similar events through different perspectives. In this case, having a double dose of Mariam and Rowan, who I found dull and obnoxious respectively, detracted from my enjoyment of book.

In summary, this was a good idea but the characters chosen for POVs were not interesting, fairly privileged, and their recollections or epiphanies were usually either unsurprising or not as interesting as expected.

rojaed's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

This is a disappointing read. There is little character differentiation, they all seem to be variations of the author. The climax is wasted.

softandcrunchy's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.5

I know lots of people are unfavourably comparing this to The Secret History, which makes perfect sense, but I enjoyed reading this a lot more. Maybe because I only expected it to be a fun story rather than anything insightful. And there's no doubt that the writing is good.
It's a white, privileged writer's take on contemporary, privileged, progressive angst, and I enjoyed the soap opera ride. It was fun hating characters like Rowan and Mariam, who are slaves to their ideals and over-indulged children, and Eloise and Binx, with their exploitative, dystopian aspirations. What's interesting is that the writer chose to kill only one of the novels awful characters.

stonecoldjaneausten's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional hopeful reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

tasmanian_bibliophile's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

‘Veritas’

The novel opens with extracts from the ‘Harvard Class of 2003 – Fifteenth Anniversary Report’: the self-penned entries of five close friends introduce the characters we will meet at the fifteen-year anniversary reunion: Jomo, Juliet (Jules), Eloise, Mariam, and Rowan. The chapters that follow provide us with a third person perspective from four of them. Only four? Jules, a famous actress, is very private and her own perspective is not shared. Jomo is a successful gemologist, carrying an engagement ring, but unable to propose to his girlfriend Giselle. Eloise has built a profession on the science of happiness. She is now Professor of Hedonics but struggles with some issues. Her wife, Binx is younger, and has different priorities. Mariam and Rowan married early. Rowan is the principal of a public school in Brooklyn while Mariam is occupied with the ‘daily slog of parenting’. Money is tight for Mariam and Rowan. Rowan wonders if they should have chosen meaning over wealth? And then there is the elephant in the room: the despised Frederick Reese, the disliked son of a disliked American president.

While we learn about each character from their own third person perspectives and their interactions with each other, our perspectives of Jules and Frederick are limited to the observations of others.
Everyone is hiding something, each presents an aspect of themselves to the others, but what is truth? Why doesn’t Mariam tell Rowan about her newly found religious beliefs? Why doesn’t Eloise share her ambivalence around surrogacy with Binx? And why is Jomo unable to propose to Giselle?
All these questions are overshadowed by the death of Frederick Reese, whose body is found on the last day of the reunion weekend. Truth in death?

I finished this novel hoping that some of the tensions between characters would be resolved, but recognising that life is complicated, that the friction between ambition and achievement is real and that communication is never complete. I am left disquieted about my feeling that the death of Frederick Reese is justified, and I am delighted that I have no wish to make the acquaintance of a fembot named Elly+.

Jennifer Cameron-Smith

ashtrimmmer's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

becsbookshelf's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I read the synopsis for this one and was instantly drawn too it. From students to Harvard graduates. These friends have been through it all. In the lead up to their 15year reunion some are more excited than others.

The book flips between POV of all the friends, now middle aged life’s taken them all in different directions. For the reunion they are all heading back to their campus at Harvard to spend the weekend together. But when a member of the class idols found dead they begin to have doubts about each other and start asking questions.

This one subtly sneaks up on you the bam. Love, lives, loss, unhappiness and murder. Everyone’s got secrets, the good the bad and the ugly!

breannaminisini's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I really really enjoyed it. I bought this book on sale, liked the look and honestly wasn’t sure if I ever would read it. I decided, because of my original theory on my feelings toward the book, that I would listen to it as an audiobook. I am so disappointed I did and not read it physically. I loved it. Some of the thoughts and feelings described were thought provoking and compelling. I really enjoyed it.

qveenmab's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

harvard students really are just insufferable
(dnf)