Scan barcode
amberinpieces's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Moderate: Sexual content, Vomit, and Cursing
Minor: Classism, Cancer, Death, Lesbophobia, Alcohol, Death of parent, Grief, Infidelity, Hate crime, Medical content, and Homophobia
jazzlioness's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Moderate: Homophobia and Fatphobia
Minor: Death of parent
courtneyboaz's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Moderate: Death of parent
rosiereviewsreads's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Miscommunication trope, enough to make me sigh, but I finished the book.
Moderate: Homophobia
Minor: Death of parent and Toxic relationship
Too many mentions of RBG, as if she was an imaginary friendmiddumullu's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.0
Moderate: Death of parent, Homophobia, and Cancer
Minor: Infidelity
plumpaperbacks's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.0
Playing the Palace was a story of insta-love between two poorly developed characters, with a slew of rather shallow, stereotypical side characters and an absurd number of moments where I cringed so hard, I had to put the book down. A few especially cringey parts included Carter and Edgar going into the former’s bedroom to have sex while his roommates were home, Edgar using a lion puppet to ask Carter for sex, and Carter repeatedly asking his framed photo of Ruth Bader Ginsburg questions and imagining her answers.
Honestly, I’m not sure what else to say about this book. The whole thing felt rushed, and kind of like a fever dream. It was clear that Rudnick was trying to do a lot of things with PTP, but all he succeeded in, as far as I’m concerned, is making a mess. I’m sorry to say it, but there’s just no way for me to sugarcoat that and still be honest. 🤷🏼
Representation
- gay Jewish protagonist
- gay love interest
- queer Black side characters (includes gay and sapphic rep)
- achillean romance
- achillean side couple
Moderate: Vomit
Minor: Sexual content, Infidelity, and Death of parent
Infidelity and parent death both occurred prior to the story and are briefly mentioned.caitlinjadams's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Minor: Cancer, Death of parent, Homophobia, Infidelity, and Sexual content
stardustandrockets's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Carter is one messy human—which makes sense after being cheated on for years and being made to feel inadequate. Edgar is a closed-off royal who doesn't trust easily and has to watch his every step because he's in the public eye. He falls for Carter the first time they met and the rest is on fire.
Each chapter is more drama-filled than the last it seems. I didn't think anything could get more dramatic that puking up your soul on International television, but boy was I proven wrong. Several of Carter's "fuck ups" seemed to come out of left field and gave me whiplash, leaving me thinking, "How did we get here?" I liked this one okay *at this point I haven't finished yet*, but I don't think it'll be one I'll own (unless I find it at a used bookstore).
I had high hopes, but going in expecting it to be RWRB may have been too high of an expectation. Idk. It feels to me that this one could have been longer and a bit more fleshed out and less disjointed. That's not to say I didn't enjoy it overall. James was definitely a bright spot for me in this book because he was witty, sarcastic, and everything I'd want in a gay, Alfred-esque, butler-type character. Though things felt a bit rushed and the pacing was weird, I give it 4 stars despite all of that. It was a fun read and definitely a palate cleanser after reading so much dark academia.
Graphic: Homophobia, Toxic relationship, and Vomit
Moderate: Death of parent and Infidelity
Minor: Cancer and Sexual content
mxm0290's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
Graphic: Vomit
Moderate: Homophobia and Infidelity
Minor: Death of parent
meganpbennett's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.5
And the story itself felt forced. Stereotypical. One-dimensional. Like an author writing tropes while hating the same tropes they're writing and not wanting to be considered a romance author. The story was entertaining, but barely. It felt like the funny, entertaining, or interesting parts were forced, which made the flow of the story awkward and forced. Kinda like a first date between tweens/teens.
The story was all over the place, with major emphasis on things that could have been minor, and barely touching on things that could be major. There were random brand shout-outs, while other things were renamed.
I've seen people say that Playing the Palace is the next Red, White, and Royal Blue. It's not. Sure, it has some tropes in common. But it's not in the same league as Red, White, and Royal Blue.
Graphic: Vomit
Moderate: Homophobia, Infidelity, Cancer, and Death of parent