Scan barcode
lady_valhella's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Animal death, Bullying, Child abuse, Death of parent, Emotional abuse, Physical abuse, Grief, and Slavery
annorabrady's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
Moderate: Death of parent, Classism, Toxic relationship, Slavery, Grief, and Child abuse
gh7blis's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? N/A
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A
2.5
Moderate: Death of parent and Child abuse
iuvmoonie's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
3.5
Graphic: Death of parent, Child abuse, Physical abuse, and Emotional abuse
libt11's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Classism, Abandonment, Child abuse, Death of parent, and Physical abuse
btorsi's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
Moderate: Child abuse, Animal death, and Emotional abuse
Minor: Death of parent and Confinement
madarauchiha's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
1.0
Finally! Lesbians can have mediocre, bland fairy tales! no I kid, mostly. Not at all, actually. I really don't like this book. Remember when you were a kid and young adult novels were really well written and interesting and had depth? I know not everyone can be Ursala K Le Guin but I feel so bad for kids who don't have anything challenging and mature to read. I just know this leads them to the adult section way earlier than they can handle such themes. But I'll digest.
What's really bizarre to me is that, despite being lesbian, the amount of female relationships is almost nonexistent. We get more time spent with a cis? man Fae Person than we do with any other woman character. The idea that a young girl in a dangerous, unhealthy situation doesn't try to seek out other people, especially women, is bizarre to me. The original fairy tale had, at least, Cinderella seeking out other people and ending up with a fairy godmother. I think having some scenes of her in the market trying to converse with people, esp women, trying to maintain relationships despite her stepmother trying to isolate and degrade her until Ash could only depend on her stepmother's whims. I'm not expecting much, it's a YA novel, I don't want to see explicit traumaporn. Just... something. Make an effort to expand Ash's world to make it a shock when the stepmother takes away Ash's freedom.
Like, that could have built up tension and make you really root for the main character! But no, we just get occasional scenes of the one other female servant doing chores until she gets dismissed. [Not a spoiler, it happens in a few portrayals of this tale]
No, the dead mother does not count. It's not an active living relationship.
Speaking of the Fae man person? Um, so that was resolved
I'm not sure if the curse to love a lesbian was a metaphor or not, so no comment. Actually comment, someone explain that to me, thanks.
So the mother
The way the girl child has to figure out how to
The love interest. I wish they used her name instead of title. It felt very dehumanizing and I couldn't get into the romance. I tried using a name replacer in my ereader, which replaced every 'huntress' with her name and made it seem like Ash had a polycule of lesbian lovers. Great, though incredibly confusing to read when fairy tales came up and she was in every one of them.
Maybe I should've read harder into it, but I didn't get the vibe Ash as falling in love with anyone, much less a woman. Like, listen. Lesbianically, I check out women. Not in a sexually harassing way, but I do notice and think to myself yeah she's hot, her bulge is pretty, I'd Winky Face her You Know What etc. That just doesn't happen in this book. I can't tell if that's just a lack of chemistry between the love interests. Is Ash asexual? Aromantic? Has her stepmother broken her mentally so she doesn't know what a normal healthy relationship or attraction is? I mean that's possible. The only 'healthy' relationships Ash has ever seen was her father with her bio mother, and then with her step mother. There's also the other
If there were scenes of Ash getting in trouble for her gaze lingering too long, and someone noticing, thus getting her in trouble. Like, I hate seeing lesbophobia in novels, but I'd trust an actual lesbian of color to portray this with tact. Ash is already in a toxic situation, being in the closet would make sense and be empathetic to readers who might also be in the same situation. And it wouldn't even be lesbophobia as much as it is the step mother not wanting to lose an indentured servant / slave.
I don't know why I typed out all this for a not quite old book from 2009. I really doubt the author will see this, why bother making suggestions? I do hope aspiring authors* see this and register how to make a plot more interesting, sensible, empathic, etc etc,
*not you fanficcers, you can choke. Unless you're minors, then never mind, explore your art but remember to get out of fanfic when you hit college age. You will only stunt your art, trust me, I learned this the hard way.
Diversity.
uhhhh lesbian? A lesbians? Two of them, at least. Judging by the cover, Ash is supposed to be white, and this is upheld by the incredibly white european world setting. So no, not really diverse, aside from two lesbians. I think at some part the huntress' skin was described as golden? Or golden in the sunlight? Which gave me some racist vibes. Like why'd you make the animal killing, supposedly butch character brown skinned? Are we really pulling that stereotype here? The author is an incredibly lightskinned asian woman, I'm not buying that there's no colorism here.
I think if there were no lesbians this book would get the worst ratings. No really. It's not like other cishet authors trying to use lgbt characters / plots / themes for brownie points because aiming for diversity points is 'what's in style' these days. No, it's that most people see lgbt characters and themes, and automatically think the book is great. Even if the book is the most bland, poorly written, time wasting, pointless book ever written. I wish people would understand that checking off 'lgbt' from a Diversity Plot Point Checklist does not make a good book. LGBT characters should be included yes, but with genuine intent. I think it was Gailey's 'upright women wanted' wherein there was a basic checklist of lgbt characters introduced and then their lgbtness was barely brought up or had an impact on the story at all.
This is like that book. LGBT has an inherent impact on an lgbt person's life. It changes how we interact with a cissexist, homophobic society. I didn't get that impression at all in this book. You could swap genders / pronouns for either Ash or the Huntress to make it a cishet relationship, and nothing would change the story.
You might say, so what? It's a YA genre novel, who cares if it's not that deep?
I think it's important that such things are reflected. Children aren't stupid or ignorant to how their sexuality influences their lives, especially LGBT children. To not have such a thing shown in a story about Lesbians is ridiculous.
Prose.
Ok. It was pretty, the writing was legible. The author did a lovely job of describing the forest scenes, anyways.
At this point I have run out of steam for this lousy book. It took an hour to read, so there's that positive, at least. This book was the equivalent of eating a bowl of white rice, but the serving is slightly too small to make you feel full. Also it comes with no other servings much less soy sauce so you're really left unsatisfied even though it's rice. Rice!!
content warnings
major animal death , animal cruelty, animal hunting, gore, dogs, confinement, medical content, death, child abuse, emotional abuse, grief, parental death
medium body horror, misogyny
minor dogs, dead animal, blood
Graphic: Gore, Death, Death of parent, Medical content, Animal cruelty, Animal death, Confinement, Emotional abuse, Child abuse, and Grief
Moderate: Body horror and Misogyny
Minor: Slavery, Animal death, and Blood
melaniereadsbooks's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.25
Moderate: Death of parent, Child abuse, and Emotional abuse
shybookstagramer's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.5
Graphic: Child abuse, Death of parent, and Emotional abuse
Moderate: Animal death
Minor: Confinement
animal death is a stag being hunted and killedpawprintedpages's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
3.0
Moderate: Child abuse and Emotional abuse