Scan barcode
patrickmuto's review against another edition
5.0
I wouldn't recommend this to anyone who isn't already a huge Rolling Stones fan. But if you consume Stones knowledge like I do, then this is perfect. It's basically exactly what you really want to know about - what it's like to hang out with these guys on tour. What they do, what they talk about, travel, shows, girls, drugs, etc. Just a very cool account from a guy who was friends with the band.
martinbainbridge's review against another edition
1.0
“You can lead a horse to water but you can’t use a torch under water”
Jim Moir, Sunboiled onions
Brothers and sisters, I couldn’t get it together to dig this book. The Rolling Stones aren’t my scene but I was willing to get down with it. I just found it a drag; very weird. Too many hang-ups. Not groovy. I found the use of repetition unusual and jarring. It was really jarring and I just found it jarring.
Most of the first half was about the author’s publishing contract and, sort of, getting it signed. He kept running into problems getting the contract signed; he just couldn’t get it signed. There was far too little time spent on the music; a fraction of the book covers the Stones' live performances and there's virtually no description of the songwriting or recording process.
Alternating chapters between the episodes leading up to Brian Jones’ demise and the Altamont hassles just didn’t keep it together, okay? Most of the people, places and situations involved were integral to both parts so there were no disparate strands that could be pulled together satisfyingly. I guess you could say it wasn't very cohesive. It could have been more cohesive; it just didn’t seem cohesive.
Starting each chapter with a pretentious epigraph, apropos of nothing, started to freak me out. I nearly split. Still, it was, like, wow! a free download which was far out. It would have been, you know, heavy if I’d had to spend some bread to get hold of this cat’s book.
Okay, cool out. I know. I’m hip. I dig music biographies, not self-indulgent, drug-addled ramblings, man. That’s not my scene.
Everybody be cool now, alright? Can we still make it down in the front? Can we still collect ourselves?
Jim Moir, Sunboiled onions
Brothers and sisters, I couldn’t get it together to dig this book. The Rolling Stones aren’t my scene but I was willing to get down with it. I just found it a drag; very weird. Too many hang-ups. Not groovy. I found the use of repetition unusual and jarring. It was really jarring and I just found it jarring.
Most of the first half was about the author’s publishing contract and, sort of, getting it signed. He kept running into problems getting the contract signed; he just couldn’t get it signed. There was far too little time spent on the music; a fraction of the book covers the Stones' live performances and there's virtually no description of the songwriting or recording process.
Alternating chapters between the episodes leading up to Brian Jones’ demise and the Altamont hassles just didn’t keep it together, okay? Most of the people, places and situations involved were integral to both parts so there were no disparate strands that could be pulled together satisfyingly. I guess you could say it wasn't very cohesive. It could have been more cohesive; it just didn’t seem cohesive.
Starting each chapter with a pretentious epigraph, apropos of nothing, started to freak me out. I nearly split. Still, it was, like, wow! a free download which was far out. It would have been, you know, heavy if I’d had to spend some bread to get hold of this cat’s book.
Okay, cool out. I know. I’m hip. I dig music biographies, not self-indulgent, drug-addled ramblings, man. That’s not my scene.
Everybody be cool now, alright? Can we still make it down in the front? Can we still collect ourselves?
lavina_l's review against another edition
4.0
You don't have to be a huge fan of the Rolling Stones to find this a superbly well-written, incredible piece of music journalism—and a great book, period.
The period covered (1969-1970, ending with Altamont) is indisputably fascinating—so good fodder for a story—but this wouldn't be fantastic if it weren't for Stanley Booth's sane telling of it.
The period covered (1969-1970, ending with Altamont) is indisputably fascinating—so good fodder for a story—but this wouldn't be fantastic if it weren't for Stanley Booth's sane telling of it.
captainfez's review against another edition
5.0
The Stones are now a band that it's impossible to view independently. They're like a Mount Rushmore in dick-sticking jeans, or a Statue of Liberty with a drug problem: something that defies description.
And yet, Stanley Booth's book made me feel like I was closer to understanding the blokes in [an iteration of] the band than any number of tell-all interviews or coy promotional bullshit.
More than that, it made me feel, momentarily, a little of how the times in question felt. I understand that something as prosaic as the claim "it made you feel like you were there" is doing this book a disservice, but it really does. The times in question are twofold, given that Booth's great achievement here is in presenting both the early history of the band (which he wasn't present for) and the 1969 US tour, which culminated in the epoch-ending gig at the Altamont Speedway (which he was).
It's no wonder this book took twenty years to write properly. It's a polished black stone, exhibiting all the revision and tightening of a Fitzgerald work: everything sings and is a little bit ridiculous, taking the excesses so far that it almost seems implausible, but which strike home nonetheless because of the plain honesty of the text. The excoriation of the Stones and their hangers-on is nothing in comparison to the self-laceration Booth delivers on himself; a shitty boyfriend, a drug fiend and a hanger-on himself. The nearest thing I can associate it with is the sort of gonzo journalism of Hunter S. Thompson, except Booth isn't under any illusions about his self-worth.
It's not just about Altamont, though the shadow of the event that killed the '60s for good is certainly large. It's also about Brian Jones, the golden-haired boy who founded the band and ended up dead in a pool at 27. It's about the suburban house and quiet frustration of his grieving parents, about his multiple kids and musical questing, despite the fact everyone else thought he wasn't much cop at writing actual songs. And for all the hedonism surrounding the band, the drug trials and at-will fucking, it's a tale of disappointment and where that leads you – an especially bitter pill to swallow when your mates are scaling the face of the world, I guess.
Greil Marcus provides the introduction for this edition, and makes much of the way the terrific violence of Altamont is presented in a manner that makes one's knees week, a strong note against the hedonistic joy of much of the rest of the work. It's true; the Hells Angels-policed gig is described in a way which evokes familiar sensations in anyone who's been in both a festival crowd and a car crash. Everything becomes elastic, time distorting beyond measure, and the awareness of incoming Bad Times is electric until the moment finally arrives.
It's a worthy climax to a book that, though it meanders, always has one eye one that fatal stage. Honestly, this thing captures so many things at once – the esprit de corps of the Rolling Stones, the crepuscular world of addiction, the false hope of a decade and the worldly simplicity of teenage life – that I wonder how it is I've avoided it so long.
Following this up might be difficult. I'm not sure there's any bio – even Keef's own – that would surpass it.
And yet, Stanley Booth's book made me feel like I was closer to understanding the blokes in [an iteration of] the band than any number of tell-all interviews or coy promotional bullshit.
More than that, it made me feel, momentarily, a little of how the times in question felt. I understand that something as prosaic as the claim "it made you feel like you were there" is doing this book a disservice, but it really does. The times in question are twofold, given that Booth's great achievement here is in presenting both the early history of the band (which he wasn't present for) and the 1969 US tour, which culminated in the epoch-ending gig at the Altamont Speedway (which he was).
It's no wonder this book took twenty years to write properly. It's a polished black stone, exhibiting all the revision and tightening of a Fitzgerald work: everything sings and is a little bit ridiculous, taking the excesses so far that it almost seems implausible, but which strike home nonetheless because of the plain honesty of the text. The excoriation of the Stones and their hangers-on is nothing in comparison to the self-laceration Booth delivers on himself; a shitty boyfriend, a drug fiend and a hanger-on himself. The nearest thing I can associate it with is the sort of gonzo journalism of Hunter S. Thompson, except Booth isn't under any illusions about his self-worth.
It's not just about Altamont, though the shadow of the event that killed the '60s for good is certainly large. It's also about Brian Jones, the golden-haired boy who founded the band and ended up dead in a pool at 27. It's about the suburban house and quiet frustration of his grieving parents, about his multiple kids and musical questing, despite the fact everyone else thought he wasn't much cop at writing actual songs. And for all the hedonism surrounding the band, the drug trials and at-will fucking, it's a tale of disappointment and where that leads you – an especially bitter pill to swallow when your mates are scaling the face of the world, I guess.
Greil Marcus provides the introduction for this edition, and makes much of the way the terrific violence of Altamont is presented in a manner that makes one's knees week, a strong note against the hedonistic joy of much of the rest of the work. It's true; the Hells Angels-policed gig is described in a way which evokes familiar sensations in anyone who's been in both a festival crowd and a car crash. Everything becomes elastic, time distorting beyond measure, and the awareness of incoming Bad Times is electric until the moment finally arrives.
It's a worthy climax to a book that, though it meanders, always has one eye one that fatal stage. Honestly, this thing captures so many things at once – the esprit de corps of the Rolling Stones, the crepuscular world of addiction, the false hope of a decade and the worldly simplicity of teenage life – that I wonder how it is I've avoided it so long.
We had all, Stones, fans, hangers-on, parasites, observers, been filled with optimism there in the autumn of 1969, optimism that the following years proved completely unjustified. In our private lives as in the public life of our time, we were disappointed, by others and by ourselves. This is I expect the experience of all generations, but we believed that we were different, that we were somehow chosen, or anointed, for success, for love and happiness. We were wrong.
Following this up might be difficult. I'm not sure there's any bio – even Keef's own – that would surpass it.
kirklandprosecco's review against another edition
2.0
Wish I could have finished it, because I think there may have been a good payoff, but the book was too excruciatingly boring to continue. I despise when authors or filmmakers spend chunks of time describing how difficult it was to get the funding/approval/whatever to make the bio or documentary. Don't make yourself the story. There was a good turn of phrase or two, here and there, but not enough to get through the long passages of what the author ate, whose car he rode in here or there, etc. etc.