bmip666's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark informative mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

trilliz's review

Go to review page

4.0

Loved the revisionist conclusion - actually more satisfying than the original! The psychology used to get there was less fun to read.

harvio's review

Go to review page

5.0

- Bayard, a noted French Psychoanalyst, deconstructs Christie's famous novel and suggests, no, declares outright that Christie's solution was wrong. Hercule Poirot's "little grey cells" undergo a "psychic blindness" resulting in him fingering the wrong killer. All of the major characters (and a number of minor characters) have their "psyches" probed - and the result is wonderful. In the end, I entirely agree tat the doctor's wife, and not the doctor himself, most likely killed Ackroyd!

mayhap's review

Go to review page

5.0

Less dazzling than his later book in the same vein, Sherlock Holmes Was Wrong, but highly readable, clever, and ultimately persuasive

beata's review

Go to review page

3.0

3-3,5*

stephang18's review

Go to review page

3.0

Lots of literary theory mumbo-jumbo in the middle, but the ending is clever. Only for die-hard fans.
More...