Reviews

Freud: The Making of an Illusion by Frederick Crews

ameyawarde's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Excellent book, horrible sh*thead of a human being. Just, WOW. I knew I didn't like him simply from his theories, but this sheds so much light on what a gross human being he was as well. He was a liar, a fraud, a HORRIBLE doctor (like, wow), a cocaine promoter/dealer, a raging misogonyst and did untold damage to his patients lives, especially the women-- and his good friend who was a morphine user- but Freud put him on cocaine as well, and the rest of his life he was a user of both, costing the world a *legitimately* brilliant mind (unlike Freud's trash brain). He would overlook even the most obvious -to-any-doctor-of-the-time condition in these women and refuse to treat them for anything but "hysteria". He also stole the very idea of psychotherapy from someone else, not even really changing the name. It is infuriating how famous he was and is considering he did not actually contribute a single positive thing to the world. Oh man, I hate this dude. Parts of the book were hard to read because of it, but it was well written and I definitely recommend it to anyone curious about what Freud was really like, outside of the psychoanalyst community that has been protecting his reputation for so long...

stevenyenzer's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I am so glad to have my long-standing and largely unfounded opinion of Freud validated: he was a huge fraud and psychoanalysis is “supported” by an almost entirely unscientific foundation. Crews slashes through the Freud mythology using exhaustive research but also comes across as somewhat of a fanatic, which doesn’t help his argument.

kevenwang's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

This is the first biography of Freud. Decent effort.

carolynf's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Definitely makes its case that Freud's reputation was undeservedly high for way too long. It was a bit dry in places because it is so specific, seemingly going case by case through Freud's career.

Reasons to feel bad for Freud:
- He was of Jewish ancestry in an place and time that viewed Jews as culturally and racially inferior.
- He was the only son of a struggling family with a lot of daughters, so he was under a lot of pressure to provide for the family.
- He was kind of pushed into medicine because it was a prestigious career and he was good at Latin, regardless of him not having any intrinsic interest in medicine.

Reasons to be appalled at Freud:
- He was much more a perpetrator of antisemitism that an victim. There are very few historical examples of him being harassed or passed over due to his Jewish ancestry. But he forbade his wife, the daughter of a prominent rabbi from expressing her religion in any way whatsoever, and spread unscientific depictions of Jewish people in his writings.
- He was horribly misogynist and homophobic, and completely bought into the condemnation of masturbation prevalent in society at the time. These ideas also were given a longer longevity in society than they perhaps would have if he was not spreading misinformation.
- When he was a doctor at mental institutions treating epilepsy and "hysteria" he was completely unmoved by the physical and sexual abuse that the inmates suffered, and by the lead doctor intentionally making his patients ill again so that he could continue to display them in his scientific demonstrations. Freud didn't admit to any abuse himself, but boasted in his letters that he had total control over the inmates and could do whatever he wanted with them.
- His publications lack statistics or any attempts at scientific measurement or mathematical documentation, because he was actually horrible at math. Instead he aimed to spread his theories through assertive arguments.
- He would change the names and facts in his case studies in such a way as to make it impossible for other researchers to build on his information in any kind of reliable way. You had to accept his writings at face value, or not at all.
- He not only used cocaine, but insisted that it was a viable treatment for morphine additional long after more knowledgeable scientists had discounted it, because he didn't want to back down from a scientific claim once he had published it and it was starting to bring him fame.
More...