Reviews

At the Mountains of Madness and Other Novels of Terror by H.P. Lovecraft

petrareadssometimes's review against another edition

challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced

4.0

cbrown4652's review against another edition

challenging dark mysterious fast-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Plot
• Strong character development? No
• Loveable characters? No
• Diverse cast of characters? No
• Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

singular_coyote's review against another edition

dark slow-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? A mix
• Strong character development? No
• Loveable characters? No
• Diverse cast of characters? No

2.0

I simultaneously need Howard Philips to pick up a thesaurus and shut up. He is so prone to repeatly using the same works and also the title of the story in the text to the point where I groaned just about everytime it happened. Also for a man who finds himself incapable of describing the horrors which he himself created has no problem in the slightest describing rocks for a literal hour. But it gets a bit of a boost score wise for massive penguins. The narrator of the audiobook is rather pleasant, but I find myself adverse to the way he pronounces "fungi".

bperl's review against another edition

3.0

If you’re into Lovecraft’s lore, you MUST read this - it’s extremely exposition-heavy, and many secrets are exposed. However, it does end up sidetracking the story, which is otherwise fairly colorless.

loulou009's review against another edition

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Plot
• Strong character development? It's complicated
• Loveable characters? N/A
• Diverse cast of characters? No
• Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

jimbowen0306's review

3.0

I turned to Lovecraft because I read some where that Stephen King (an author I enjoy) liked them/used them as inspiration. I can certainly see why King was drawn to them (or more accurately, elements here had echoes/ripples in King's work), it's just they sometimes felt... underdeveloped. I'd have liked to see these novellas turned into longer works that had a more developed stores, and were fully developed novels in their own right.

You know when you had to write an essay under exam conditions at school, you sometimes run out of time, and end up saying the main character woke up and found it had all been a dream? Well in some of these stories, it felt like Lovecraft ran out of steam, and ended up writing "Well we bricked up the holes, and went on with our lives, but some of us had nightmares." For much the same reason. This problem was less acute here, but in his shorter stories, it was a pretty common occurrence, so if you were to read any Lovecraft collection, this might be as good as any.

squeakybones's review against another edition

adventurous mysterious medium-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Plot
• Strong character development? No
• Loveable characters? N/A
• Diverse cast of characters? No
• Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

wakkle's review against another edition

dark slow-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Plot
• Strong character development? No
• Loveable characters? No
• Diverse cast of characters? No
• Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

zozosbooks's review against another edition

2.0

Boring as hell! Must have been good for its time….. but even then there’s literally no plot or character development or emotions. How can so many words say so little?

duke_'s review against another edition

dark mysterious tense slow-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Plot
• Strong character development? No
• Loveable characters? No

3.0