Scan barcode
megane's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
emotional
informative
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.25
ailenach's review against another edition
mysterious
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
drewdelidou's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
informative
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
huntland's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
hopeful
tense
fast-paced
4.75
bookstin's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
funny
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.25
the_other_yvonne's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
hopeful
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
hedgielib's review against another edition
challenging
dark
hopeful
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
rycantread's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
emotional
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.25
ninette's review against another edition
2.0
Dreadful. I give up. If I had to endure one more page of this drivel, I would throw it out of the god damn window! Could she get to the point sometime this century?! Does she know that there is a difference between tension and frustration? Did she have an editor? How many times can someone faint just before they are able to dispense some vital piece of information?! And why is communications technology basically the same as in 1992 except with video and without answering machines? And computers for accessing the NHS-database and seemingly nothing else? They invented time travel, but couldn't figure out a more efficient way to communicate?! I guess we can not fault her for failing to envision cell phones. But morse code was already better than this. Hell, pigeons or smoke signals would have been more efficient.
Also, somehow while they have time travel, the historians have forgotten most of what they already knew about the middle ages and seem to be laboring under the same misconceptions that the general public has. And considering how important infectious diseases and public health are to the plot, the understanding of them seems somewhat basic. It seems to me that Willis was so bogged down with minutiae of human interactions, that factual research and the bigger picture of her story have fallen mostly by the wayside.
Also, somehow while they have time travel, the historians have forgotten most of what they already knew about the middle ages and seem to be laboring under the same misconceptions that the general public has. And considering how important infectious diseases and public health are to the plot, the understanding of them seems somewhat basic. It seems to me that Willis was so bogged down with minutiae of human interactions, that factual research and the bigger picture of her story have fallen mostly by the wayside.