Reviews

Padri e figli by Franco Cordelli, Ivan Turgenev

o_tulp's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

dreynoldsbook's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

newhope's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced

2.0

well it took me 9 months to finish a 200 page book. that should tell you everything about it.

dee_crow's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional inspiring reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character

4.0

crowwithaknife's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25

kgfugate8299's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

sidharthvardhan's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

The first time I heard of Turgenev, it was Dostoevsky. Dostoevsky parodied Turgenev in his character 'Karmazinov' in novel 'Demons' for writing 'Fathers and Sons'. Turgenev's novel is based on the nihilist generation and the differences they had with the previous generation - that of socialists. The 'nihilist' son Bazarov in the novel refuse to believe in anything based solely on authority - whether it be established sciences, practices, arts or traditions. The 'fathers' in the book are in too much of awe for their sons and even have some sort of guilty conscience to produce arguments for their way of thinking. However the nihilism has its own problems. (to began with, nihilism is based on 'belief' that nothing is worth believing and is thus paradoxical).Even if you have good reasons to defy authority, often people tend to develop it as a habit and defy authority just for sake of it. Bazarov of the story struggles with his feelings of love just because it is a feeling in established tradition. Thus, Turgenev did brought out the fact that nihilism was not without its faults.

But the character of the Bazarov so attractive to the younger minds of the time that the novel made the word 'Nihilism' popular all over the world (he might have seemed just so 'cool') . This is probably why Dostoevsky was so critical of him - perhaps, Dostoevsky (always fascinated with new ideas, yet never letting them blind him so much as to not to see their faults) believed that 'nihilism' is much worse than Turgenev portrays it. Dostoevsky's 'Demons' (written a decade later) is based on similar themes - the divide between socialist father and nihilist son. However the nihilists and one idea people in Demons are in anguish because of their ideas or lack thereof. Stavrogin, the nihilist son in Demons, appeared 'cool' - a sort of 'Don Juan' too in the beginning of novel but as you read on, you discover that he was and is always struggling to find something to believe in. There are suicides all around in Demons - suicides and murders. When Harvey Dent in 'The Dark Knight' sees his world coming down and his belief system shattered, he starts making attempts on lives of people all around - including his own life. that a strong nihilism might make you want to commit suicide is something Camus too struggles with in his essay 'Myth of Sisyphus' - a long argument against suicide which quotes Dostoevsky's 'Demons' several times. Obsession with just one idea either makes you dull or frantic or both. Refusing to believe in anything at all might be cool at start for intellectual introspection but it drains you of energy, it is human nature to always search for, look for things to believe in, people need a belief system just like they need a ground to walk on.

isasai's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful inspiring lighthearted reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

Such a beautiful book. Characters were very likeable and writing was incredible.

asgard224's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Apărut în aceeași perioadă cu Oblomov(1859), romanul lui Turgheniev introduce tipul personajului nihilist, Bazarov, student la medicină. Este însoțit de Arkadi, prietenul său, care-i împărtășește în mod superficial convingerile. Cei doi își vizitează părinții, în decursul cărora se naște un conflict de idei între "părinți" și "copii", fiecare având concepții politice și sociale opuse. Acestea sunt puse la încercare atunci când Bazarov se îndrăgostește:

"Sângele i se aprindea de îndată ce se gândea la ea. Ar fi stăvilit el ușor pornirile sângelui, dar pătrunsese în el ceva nou, ceva ce nu voise niciodată să admită, de care râsese totdeauna și care îi jignea mândria. În discuțiile cu Anna Sergheevna își arăta mai mult decât înainte disprețul rece față de tot ce e romantic, dar, odată rămas singur, recunoștea cu indignare că și el ajunsese romantic. Atunci pleca în pădure, umbla cu pași mari rupând crengile ce i se iveau în cale, blestemând-o printre dinți atât pe ea cât și pe el; sau se cățăra în podul cu fân de deasupra hambarului și, închizând ochii cu încăpățânare, se silea să adoarmă, ceea ce bineînțeles nu izbutea totdeauna."

În urma unui duel, Bazarov se mută la părinții săi, care îl întâmpină cu căldură, pentru a lucra ca medic. I se prescrie un destin tragic.

crossmaster_flash's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Unyieldingly timeless