Reviews tagging 'Grief'

Happiness Falls by Angie Kim

38 reviews

moriahleigh's review

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad medium-paced
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cheyarsen's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

4.5 stars ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️✨

Okay, I really loved this one. 

This book follows the perspective of Mia, the unabashedly and hyper-analytical daughter and sister of the Parkson family, following the disappearance of her father. No one seems to have any idea what could’ve happened to their father. No one except for Eugene, Mia’s little brother, who shows up at home the day of their father’s disappearance covered in blood. The only problem? Eugene has Angelman Syndrome and is nonverbal and can’t communicate what he has seen to his family. Now the Parkson Family must race against the clock, not only to find their father but to protect Eugene.

What this book got right for me:

✔️ Autism/Angelman Syndrome Representation
✔️ AAPI Representation 
✔️ S2C Representation
✔️ Open Ended
✔️ Unreliable Narrator (which added to the overall mystery)
✔️ No Happy Endings (I know what you’re thinking…how is this a good thing? Don’t worry, I’ll explain)

What I didn’t love:

✔️ The amount of talk about experiments (again, I’ll explain)
✔️ The passage of time 

I oftentimes forgot while reading this book that this was a work of fiction. Kim’s connection to the characters and their stories is evident through her writing. She cares about these characters, which in turn made me care about these characters. 

I think one of my favorite things about mysteries like these is they don’t end happily in real life a lot of times. This made it feel even more real to me. As devastated as I was by the ending, I don’t think it would’ve been as moving if it had had a happy ending.

One of my only problems with this book was the way passage of time felt like weeks fit into two days, I kept forgetting the timeline as I was listening to the book. I think this in part had to do with the over abundance of talk about the Happiness Quotient Experiment. While I found it super interesting, I don’t think it really contributed much to the book other than just being an interesting tidbit.

All in all I loved this book. This is my first book from Angie Kim and I look forward to reading her debut novel as well in the future.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

livlosiewicz's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional inspiring mysterious reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Pros: 
·I think this is maybe a controversial opinion, but I adored Mia as a narrator. Her brain works the same way mine does, with all these tangents and background stories that allowed us to get to know her and her family. Mia was fun and flawed in the best ways to me 
·Of course, the standout character is Eugene!! I loved how we got to witness his growth, or maybe rather his family’s changing perspective on him. I think this was especially compelling given Mia’s retrospective commentary, which allowed us to connect the dots and view him as a compelling character all along. Of course, the most important part about his character is the visibility and representation that this provides. 
·I really enjoyed the mystery!! It was much more of a literary mystery than a thriller, which I really liked- relying on development and background as opposed to plot twists. I was sucked into the story right away and it honestly gripped me the whole time. The mystery 
·Alongside fun characters and a compelling mystery, the themes in the novel, about how what it means to be “nonverbal” vs “nonspeaking” and the parallels between Mia and Hannah’s experiences in Korea and the US and Eugene’s experiences, were all really well-done for me and had me thinking a lot. 
 
Cons: 
·I do think the novel lost a bit of its steam towards the end of the novel, the last 75 pages or so. I do respect the way that she resolved (or in some cases, chose not to) different aspects of the plot, but I was so so hooked at the beginning and was surprised at the change of pace. 
 
Recommendation: I recommend to fans of literary fiction or family drama who like elements of mystery. I think you might have to be nerdy to love this book, because Mia gives a lot of fun facts about things and her dad’s journals have a lot of philosophical musings. But I am nerdy, so I did indeed love it. This is not a thriller, but it does have a nice quick pace, and you get to know the Parkson family very well throughout the background. I also recommend to readers looking to increase their understanding of other people or the identity representation in the books they read. Avoid if you’re looking for completely plot-based thrillers, don’t like when narrators go on tangents and background rants, or don’t like philosophical musings. Also check content warnings, mainly minor content warnings for grief. 
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

melodyseestrees's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25

There are so many frustrating elements to this story, especially the ending. The character motivations seemingly make sense but the character actions do not necessarily match up quite right. There are many questions in the latter half of the book but don't hold your breath and wait for all the answers.
Mia goes 'eh, I don't care to know' and erases any evidence that was on her presumed deceased father's phone.
The end pacing also did not match up with how the rest of the story had been. A good portion of the dialogue around Eugene felt microaggression level ableist at best, though the surprise therapist at the end had the best dialogue with Eugene. Perhaps this is realistic but something about it felt off. This led to the rating falling from the expected 4 to a 3.25.
The edition I had did 'footnote' information in a jarring and disruptive way to the reading experience. Some whole pages had maybe a paragraph of information to them in an italicized font that was frustrating to read. These thoughts of Mia's surely could have been worked into the actual text as a mark of who she is as a person. 
There were a few characters who appeared, did maybe two actions, and then disappeared never to be seen again
looking at you unhinged lady in the park with pepper spray and supposedly existing band of teenage boys
. There were plot beats that were dropped.
We saw hints and part of the lead officer having seemingly faked one or two injuries in previous cases but this played very little in the hearing against Eugene for hurting her.
The notebook revealing that Mia's father was running experiments on his family, having no exploration done into it. Was he really just writing notes to himself? Was he writing a paper? Was he as unhinged as park pepper spray lady? We'll never know!
The police, having access to the same information as Mia not putting together the unlock code, as all of that info came from the notebook they were scanning and sending to Mia. Can police even do that during an active investigation?
Harmonee's backstory being sort of explained despite her having very little to do with the story. The perspective of familial trauma given was interesting but never really led anywhere. One could argue that whole history didn't need to be spelled out since it amounted to John was special cuz he looked white, Mia was treated like she was dumb because she didn't look white, Eugene witnessed a death firsthand, John and Mia learned how to whisper yell.

This book felt like it was trying to fit several stories into one- Harmonee's story, Mia's dad's story, Eugene's story, and Mia's memoir.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lindseybkoehler's review

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful informative inspiring mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

skbat's review

Go to review page

challenging emotional mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kotletka_polina's review

Go to review page

dark emotional hopeful mysterious reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.25

It was not what I expected. This book leaned more towards literally fiction despite the premise being set as a thriller/mystery. The open ending is very anticlimactic giving that the resolution seemed so close.
But I liked this book. Even though it has too much yapping at times, I really sympathised with the characters, feeling what they were feeling at that moment: rage and infuriation at their fathers’s secrets, nervousness and suspicion with each new peace of information revealed. I even found the narrator relatable somehow.
Even though it’s not the vibe I expected to get I still pretty much enjoyed it. Read the entire book in a couple of sittings without getting tired of complicated vocabulary (English isn’t my first language). It brings awareness to numerous important subjects and highlights issues I hadn’t paid enough attention before. I liked this book more than I expected. 
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sparklefarm's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

I love discovering new-to-me authors and loving them immediately. This was an excellent read - I was hooked and in suspense from the get-go. Philosophical, tense, and personal - not a mix I expected, but one I really enjoyed. The author's note was meaningful (although upon reflection made some of the philosophizing and reflection within the work a bit heavy-handed, although I don't know that I really minded). Highly recommend.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cryptofauna's review

Go to review page

emotional mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

oh my gosh. another book that i really wasn’t that into at the beginning (a common trend for me, i am a hater at heart) but holy shit i’m so glad i continued. moving, tense, mysterious, emotional, riveting. i loved every character and although it took a second to get going at the beginning the plot was very strong. super well researched and you could tell just how much the author put into this story especially after reading her notes at the end.
felt very respectful of disabled people as well. ofc not an expert, but the experiences of everyone felt realistic and compassionate even when they resented him as typical glass children do
my only dumb and silly gripe is that at one point the author used kitty-corner instead of caddy-corner. how did that get past editors 
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lindsayerin's review

Go to review page

emotional mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5

Expand filter menu Content Warnings