Scan barcode
taleofabibliophile's review against another edition
2.75
Graphic: Medical content, Toxic friendship, Bullying, Animal cruelty, Ableism, Emotional abuse, Animal death, Dementia, Medical trauma, and Mental illness
Moderate: Abandonment, Pregnancy, Violence, Sexual content, and Blood
Minor: Excrement and Suicidal thoughts
benegesserwitch's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Graphic: Physical abuse, Animal cruelty, Ableism, Dementia, Child abuse, and Bullying
Moderate: Medical trauma, Excrement, Medical content, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , and Panic attacks/disorders
ellaticonstellation's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Remembering a lot of painful memories sucked. There's a reason why the unconscious is there to help us cope with life's greatest challenges. Being knowledgeable has its perks and curses.
Experiments may be magical, but not an assurance of permanence. It's like being sharp, but we need to maintain it in our own way.
Algernon! You're a great metaphor!
I will never forget this story.
Thank you, Daniel✨
Graphic: Emotional abuse, Medical content, Bullying, Gaslighting, Ableism, Mental illness, Physical abuse, Animal cruelty, Dementia, Medical trauma, and Panic attacks/disorders
moxiereads's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Ableism, Animal death, Child abuse, Medical content, Physical abuse, Animal cruelty, Mental illness, Alcohol, Bullying, Dementia, Abandonment, Emotional abuse, and Suicidal thoughts
thegreatelise's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Aujourd'hui, j'ai 19 ans, et cela fait 2-3 ans que l'envie de le relire trotte dans ma tête, et je l'ai enfin fait.
J'ai adoré de A à Z et encore plus qu'à l'époque je pense, évidemment durant cette seconde lecture j'avais plus de connaissances qui m'ont accompagné dans mes réflexions sur ce récit et sur ce que représente le fait d'acquérir de l'intelligence ou l'ignorance que l'on peut avoir face aux moqueries si on ne comprend pas que ce sont des moqueries.
Il va sans dire que le point fort du livre est l'écriture et l'évolution de l'orthographe ainsi que de la tournure des phrases du personnage que je trouve brillante et que je trouvais déjà brillante à l'époque. Je me souviens encore de mon choque en lisant la première page.
Le personnage est très touchant du début à la fin, même si il parait un peu odieux par moment lorsque son intelligence est à son apogée, je ressentais tout de même de la compassion pour lui.
J'ai, plusieurs fois au cours de ma lecture, eu les larmes aux yeux, dû à la fois au livre lui même mais aussi des souvenirs et de la nostalgie qu'il me fait éprouver.
Cela ne touche plus le récit en lui-même mais j'ai aussi été plutôt émue par la partie sur la vie de l'auteur et l'écriture de la nouvelle puis du roman. J'ai été touchée par ce qu'il a écrit en tant que personne qui rêve également d'écrire, ça m'a donner de l'espoir ainsi que de la motivation à poursuivre mes rêves.
Et enfin lire la nouvelle originale boucle la boucle et m'a aussi apporté son lot d'émotions.
J'aimerais maintenant le lire en anglais, pour avoir la langue d'origine du livre et la réelle écriture de l'auteur.
Je pense sincèrement que c'est le genre de livre que tout le monde devrait lire au moins une fois dans sa vie, et si la personne n'en a pas la motivation, de lire au moins la nouvelle, même si le roman est évidemment bien plus développé et complet.
Moderate: Bullying, Child abuse, Emotional abuse, and Medical content
Minor: Suicidal thoughts
milly_gm01's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.75
Graphic: Bullying, Ableism, Abandonment, Animal death, Child abuse, Death, Medical content, Physical abuse, and Sexual content
Moderate: Animal cruelty, Suicidal thoughts, Confinement, Toxic friendship, Suicide, and Forced institutionalization
Minor: Dementia
scifi_rat's review against another edition
3.5
some of the psychology and sociology feels dated in many ways but ultimately it does the job it sets out to do.
Graphic: Ableism
Moderate: Child abuse, Medical content, Emotional abuse, Forced institutionalization, Abandonment, Alcohol, Bullying, Dementia, Mental illness, Alcoholism, Animal death, Animal cruelty, Confinement, and Excrement
Minor: Sexism, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Religious bigotry, Sexual content, Stalking, and Suicidal thoughts
sharktwoth's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Medical content, Emotional abuse, Forced institutionalization, Alcohol, Ableism, Mental illness, Abandonment, Animal death, Bullying, and Child abuse
Moderate: Medical content, Dementia, Sexual harassment, Medical trauma, Alcohol, Cursing, Animal cruelty, and Emotional abuse
bookishfaye's review
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
I think as a response to Frankenstein/the Prometheus myth and with commentary about man playing god within science and also monstrosity, there are some interesting things at play within this book. There were moments where I felt very seen by Charlie, and at times very beautiful/important language towards disability as well, it’s just a very very hard read that has extreme ableism/misogyny culture from the late 1950’s marked all over it.
Graphic: Alcoholism, Blood, Abandonment, Medical content, Hate crime, Animal cruelty, Medical trauma, Suicidal thoughts, Animal death, Confinement, Forced institutionalization, Injury/Injury detail, Bullying, Child abuse, Sexism, Ableism, Addiction, Alcohol, and Misogyny
dazedl's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
I read the short story years ago when I was a teenager - and coming back to this book in my mid 20s, I have a newfound appreciation towards the central themes of childhood trauma, intellectual disability and messing with someone's true nature. I found myself having deeper empathy and understanding towards Charlie's character development more than my first reading of the short story.
Graphic: Abandonment, Emotional abuse, Medical trauma, Child abuse, Medical content, Ableism, Mental illness, and Bullying
Moderate: Animal cruelty