Scan barcode
lornalynn's review
adventurous
dark
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
readingrampage's review
dark
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
jwvaughn's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
funny
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
schmendez's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
4.5
I really enjoyed the complexity the was crammed into just a couple hundred pages.
frank_l's review
adventurous
dark
funny
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
I would have preferred if there was a little more horror and a little more humour, tbh.
Likes:
- The cover, I mean it's pretty good, right?
- The plot, this seemed like it would be an enticing story and piqued my interest early on.
- Including the map at the start was a nice touch.
- Some genuinely creepy vibes near on the onset. I, especially, liked where this was going when they entered Edenville.
Dislikes:
- A lot of repeating phrases(Go Crows!) throughout that came off as a little pretentious, maybe?
- Using the word "fuckin" instead of fucking.
- "The Shattered Man" poem wasn't particularly frightening, and I'm still not sure if it was supposed to be.
- An excessive use of pop culture terms/name-dropping.
- The subplot involving the "old ladies" never quite landed for me, and was never explained in the slightest.
- A lot of things were actually not ever explained. I could tell about 50 pages from the end that there wasn't going to be any real kind of resolution, and that's not a good thing.
- Worms!?
There are some plot turns that I won't mention as it would take away from the reading experience going in knowing them beforehand. But there's a really great line near the end of the novel where the dialogue summed up my thoughts on the story pretty accurately:
Likes:
- The cover, I mean it's pretty good, right?
- The plot, this seemed like it would be an enticing story and piqued my interest early on.
- Including the map at the start was a nice touch.
- Some genuinely creepy vibes near on the onset. I, especially, liked where this was going when they entered Edenville.
Dislikes:
- A lot of repeating phrases
- Using the word "fuckin" instead of fucking.
- "The Shattered Man" poem wasn't particularly frightening, and I'm still not sure if it was supposed to be.
- An excessive use of pop culture terms/name-dropping.
- The subplot involving the "old ladies" never quite landed for me, and was never explained in the slightest.
- A lot of things were actually not ever explained. I could tell about 50 pages from the end that there wasn't going to be any real kind of resolution, and that's not a good thing.
- Worms!?
There are some plot turns that I won't mention as it would take away from the reading experience going in knowing them beforehand. But there's a really great line near the end of the novel where the dialogue summed up my thoughts on the story pretty accurately:
"Oh boy," Quinn sighed. "Ya know, at this point? I <i>barely</i> understand what's going on. So I . . . have no idea. I sorta don't give a shit."
"Same."
Overall, definitely not terrible, but it also left me hoping for a little more.
nouveau's review against another edition
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
stepriot's review
5.0
This is fun! Gore, monsters, conspiracy, other dimension and eldritch knowledge all in one relatively short time. It is wonderfully over the top and brilliantly written. I see why it was nominated for a Stoker Award this year. It works because it doesn't take itself too seriously. There's a level of self awareness that allows it to be comedic and horrible all at once. I loved it.
quabbityash's review
adventurous
challenging
dark
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
j_nell's review
adventurous
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Interesting yet grotesque. Sci-fi horror would be a good specific genre to put it in.
Graphic: Violence and Gore