Reviews tagging 'Sexual violence'

Catch-22 by Joseph Heller

22 reviews

numerous_bees's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

This is an incredibly slow book, with approximately the first two thirds feeling like setup. It's written in a meandering, stream of consciousness, style that, while not difficult to read, is often difficult to fathom the purpose of (though that, itself, may be purposeful).
The early chapters occasionally feel like reading an episode of M*A*S*H, but I'd call it humorous or wry rather than funny. It gets significantly less so as it goes on, culminating in a harrowing final third. There is no humour there, there is no purpose to the many deaths, there is only the naked desperation of a man trying to survive a brutal, senseless bureaucracy and a brutal, bloody war. Nothing is surprising any more, no matter how ridiculous, they just become just another awful thing about an awful situation. Of course,
Milo has removed and sold the morphine from the first aid kit when Snowden needs it
. Of course,
Nately's whore (who never gets a name) appears to teleport around the country to stab Yossarian
. Why wouldn't these things happen? 
At the time of writing, 12% of people have tagged this book as "lighthearted", and frankly I hope they're okay.

This was not a fun read and, at the halfway mark, I had decided to pass the book on after I finished it, but now I have turned the last page, it's sitting with me. I think, on balance, I would recommend it but it was not enjoyable. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

haleyd's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional funny sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

atorno's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark reflective sad slow-paced

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

amberinbookland's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny slow-paced

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

impeachnixon's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional funny tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

alexhaydon's review

Go to review page

dark sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

2.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jcdudley's review

Go to review page

I think it's supposed to be deliberately frustrating but I just couldn't bring myself to continue reading it much longer. The characters are wildly unlikable and I had a hard time following the plot up until the point that I put it down.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

emily_pemily's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

callielorraine's review against another edition

Go to review page

SO COMPLETELY MISOGYNIST! Women are sexual objects with no agency, and all they seem to want to do is have sex. Every description of a woman is about her physical form, and man after man just puts his hands all over women in the story--even nurses helping injured men. There is NO acknowledgment by the author or narrator that this is wrong. It's just the culture and totally accepted. I know this is a satire, but the way women are treated and gazed at didn't feel like satire at all--I felt disgusted and violated myself, just as a woman *listening* to it. I got about 60 percent through, and I don't recall a single woman even having a line of dialogue. It was all told through the male perspective and all about the male gaze and desire. I can't believe this is STILL seen as such a classic in the canon of American literature--a few years ago it even made PBS's Great American Read list--and I can't believe we aren't talking about how totally sexist it is and how much it glorifies sexual assault. We HAVE to change the way we glorify and talk about this book!

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lisaearley's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings