Reviews

Sherlock Holmes: The Voice of Treason by Cavan Scott, George Mann

theteamsreader's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.25

soundsgay_imin's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

ash_e_moto's review

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

Meh. I’ve read better holmes fan fic—- and probably worse as well. Middle of the road as far as it goes.

beth_books_123's review

Go to review page

3.0

Interesting - 3*

Let's be real here... This was very unlikely to be 4* or 5* as I find it very difficult to love Sherlock Holmes adaptations... I'm attracted to Sherlock Holmes adaptations because I'm a proper Sherlock Holmes nerd. Anyway, I'm very critical of any adaptation but I can't help but read them.

I thought this was an audiobook but it turns out it was an Audible like drama thing. I kind of enjoyed that but the one thing I couldn't stand was all the FLASHBACKS. Omg there are other literary techniques to reveal the information. In the Audible drama, there was a sound effect that told you that it was a flashback and I used to groan because I couldn't believe it had happened again. I also thought the characters forced in this and it was just really easy to guess.

Yeah it was alright. I wouldn't read it again though.

gale_bruckner's review

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

It's interesting to see a production done in the style of a radio drama.  It was a little hard to keep track of who was talking at times, but overall, I very much enjoyed myself.  I appreciated seeing the story tied up with what we know of real-world history.  I've seen similar twists before, and I enjoyed this version of them.

jacobjonk's review

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.75

Not my favorite Holmes book but still pretty fun! The twists were just ok honestly none of them were shocking despite me not necessarily predicting them, I just felt that many weren't earned and I didn't feel myself looking for the twist. The audio drama format the book used was also a bit annoying too much background noise and such but it wasn't the worst I've had. 

mordecai's review

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot

3.0

booksundercover2022's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.25

franny2111's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.5

eserafina42's review

Go to review page

3.0

Excellent performance, which is why it gets 3 stars. The plot was way too convoluted for my taste - especially for a drama with no narration - and felt like the authors threw everything but the kitchen sink into it, and for that I would give it only 2. Holmes also made some wild leaps to conclusions with no logical basis but which, of course, turned out to be correct.