Scan barcode
arborapollonis's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Car accident, Infidelity, Blood, and Drug use
Moderate: Vomit, Excrement, and Child abuse
yurt's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Ableism, Medical content, Mental illness, Physical abuse, Suicide, Vomit, Body horror, Grief, Misogyny, Murder, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide attempt, Toxic relationship, Violence, Animal death, Car accident, Drug abuse, Excrement, Fire/Fire injury, Gore, Animal cruelty, Blood, Death, Drug use, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Sexual violence, Sexual harassment, Rape, Confinement, Torture, and Sexual assault
Minor: Biphobia, Colonisation, Lesbophobia, Racism, Stalking, Toxic friendship, Homophobia, Toxic relationship, Child death, Domestic abuse, and Fatphobia
krankliuk's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
Graphic: Gore, Chronic illness, Car accident, Drug use, Injury/Injury detail, Infidelity, Suicide, Sexual content, Self harm, Medical content, Body horror, and Blood
Minor: Pedophilia
earsore's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
1.25
An absolute waste of time on all fronts. Ballard was so hellbent on trying to be shocking that the entire purpose of the story falls utterly flat. The characters are so two-dimensional that you don't give too much of a shit when they go crazy, because they had no personalities and no reason to be invested in. There were a few parts I felt engaged, despite the utterly detatched tone of our narrator: I chuckled 2 times, and I felt disgust at about 3-4 sections of visceral accident descriptions (mostly near the end). Other than that, the prose was so abhorrently repetitive that it was putting me to sleep more than it was shocking me.
And I don't see his whole allegory for technology taking over human excitement/lust. My man, it was the 70s, your only frame of reference was cars!!! It does not feel clear at all, no matter how true it is today. It's poorly executed on all fronts and a shocking letdown compared to High-Rise.
Graphic: Car accident, Death, Gore, Sexual content, and Violence
Moderate: Toxic relationship, Sexual violence, Toxic friendship, and Drug use
Minor: Vomit, Stalking, Pedophilia, and Excrement