Scan barcode
rowanine's review
adventurous
emotional
funny
reflective
sad
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
mereduck's review
5.0
Neville-identifying, for better or for worse.
I loved Richard's Valley, and damn it Toronto you're breaking my heart here!
I loved Richard's Valley, and damn it Toronto you're breaking my heart here!
alayahjw's review
challenging
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
i just am endlessly intrigued with what michael deforge has to say with his work.
maddiekl's review
adventurous
dark
emotional
funny
inspiring
lighthearted
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
jenny_d's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
I don't really know how to feel about this book. It kind of feels like it dances around some profound message or something but never quite says it.
Graphic: Drug use and Emotional abuse
ro_reads's review
dark
funny
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
3.0
zorpblorp's review
funny
lighthearted
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
oliviachap9's review
adventurous
funny
lighthearted
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.25
ohmanbleh's review
3.0
Read this straight through in one sitting, and enjoyed it. A rag-tag group of people & animals move in & out of association with Richard, a charismatic leader who leads a cult in a Toronto public park. Everyone is trying to understand where they belong, who their friends are, and what it means to be at home. It’s very funny, and I laughed out loud at the art pretty regularly. I loved the heart-shaped raccoons, the hand-shaped spiders, & the shifting, psychedelic backgrounds of sticks, rocks & trash.
All that being said, it’s a bit twee. If you hate Wes Anderson films, I’d guess this might not be for you. For instance, a snake named Mark falls in love with a pile of rocks, then founds a cult known as the “Marksists”. When a spider sits on squirrel’s head, the two become a famous pop star. A frog steals everyone’s snow shovels and starts a black-market snow shovel business. I like this kind of thing, but by the end even I was ready for more plot/character.
I think this is more a symptom of my biggest complaint about Leaving Richard’s Valley: you can tell it was compiled from Instagram posts. Often, the pages are one-off jokes that probably made a great Instagram update but fall flat in book format. There’s also none of the creativity in layout/structure that I usually enjoy in comics - by necessity, all the compositions are either 4-panel squares or 1-panel squares. The pacing (for scene, dialog, everything) is generally broken up page-by-page.
All that being said, it’s a bit twee. If you hate Wes Anderson films, I’d guess this might not be for you. For instance, a snake named Mark falls in love with a pile of rocks, then founds a cult known as the “Marksists”. When a spider sits on squirrel’s head, the two become a famous pop star. A frog steals everyone’s snow shovels and starts a black-market snow shovel business. I like this kind of thing, but by the end even I was ready for more plot/character.
I think this is more a symptom of my biggest complaint about Leaving Richard’s Valley: you can tell it was compiled from Instagram posts. Often, the pages are one-off jokes that probably made a great Instagram update but fall flat in book format. There’s also none of the creativity in layout/structure that I usually enjoy in comics - by necessity, all the compositions are either 4-panel squares or 1-panel squares. The pacing (for scene, dialog, everything) is generally broken up page-by-page.