Reviews

Empire: the Novel of Imperial Rome by Steven Saylor

sarahjjs's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

As the author goes on to state at the end of the book, as more historical evidence becomes available the story becomes a biography of the crazy emperors. I liked Roma more because he was able to sprinkle some magic and myth with his facts but Empire was still a whole lot better than ready a start up non fiction book on Imperial Rome. I'm ready for my visit now Rome.

emilyowen88's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I have to say, I picked this because it was the second in the series (following Roma) that I got on offer from Kindle books. I wasn't the biggest fan of the first one, but wanted something unchallenging to relax to and this fits the bill. I preferred this one as it covers a better known period of history than the first, but it is still a rather superficial historical fiction novel. I did want to get to the end and it provided a few laughs, but I wouldn't rely on this for your dose of reliable history!

psteve's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

A novel about Rome from about AD 14 to 141. Good portraits of the emperors during this time, told through several generations of a single family. The sweep sometimes leaves the author with putting dialog into people's mouths that they would never say: "As you know, Pinarius, emperors usually beheaded their enemies and displayed the heads on the Avetine." Not an actual quote, but there's a lot of awkwardness like that: imagine saying, "as you know, Americans elect their presidents every four years." Towards the last 100 pages of the novel, this gets a bit old. On the other hand, the emperors are well-drawn with a good view of Roman history. The earlier novel, Roma, sounds interesting too.
More...