Scan barcode
queencleo's review
1.0
Paul Cornell's writing is clever but vague, it leaves the reader to fill in the blanks about details, mysteries, plots or endings. Not sure if I'm a fan.
lordofthemoon's review
2.0
In his introduction, [a: John Scalzi|4763|John Scalzi|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1407277112p2/4763.jpg] claims that Paul Cornell is, possibly, the nicest man in science fiction. I've only met the chap once or twice, but from those, and from Twitter, I wouldn't argue the proposition. That makes it difficult to come out and say that I didn't really enjoy much of this collection. Although Cornell has written some cracking Doctor Who, this volume, as well as my reading of the first of his Shadow Police series and his Lychford books suggest that his personal style doesn't work for me. He seems to write from a dark place, something which comes out moreso in his short fiction. The stories in this collection are set in chronological order (with the Hamilton stories sorted at the end), so we can see his style and his writing develop.
The early stories, The Deer Stalker, Michael Laurits is: DROWNING and Global Collider Generation: An Idyll feel quite experimental, and I struggled to understand a lot of them; The Sensible Folly was a lot more fun, as were the two Wild Cards stories (Cornell's contribution to [a: George R. R. Martin|346732|George R.R. Martin|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1351944410p2/346732.jpg]'s shared universe). The Ghosts of Christmas felt really bleak all the way through and I really struggled to read that story.
The Hamilton stories were interesting because they start out almost as James Bond pastiche, in a world where Newton's musings took him in a very different direction, where the great powers of the 19th century have survived and still play their Great Game, while maintaining a "balance" to avoid all-out war. It feels like these stories in particular get very dark as they go on. Hamilton is a complex character, trapped by ties of loyalty and love in a very cruel world. It's easy to feel sympathy for him, and even what he does, and still be appalled at his world.
An interesting collection, with a strong authorial voice. Read if you enjoy going to dark places, but not really to my taste.
The early stories, The Deer Stalker, Michael Laurits is: DROWNING and Global Collider Generation: An Idyll feel quite experimental, and I struggled to understand a lot of them; The Sensible Folly was a lot more fun, as were the two Wild Cards stories (Cornell's contribution to [a: George R. R. Martin|346732|George R.R. Martin|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1351944410p2/346732.jpg]'s shared universe). The Ghosts of Christmas felt really bleak all the way through and I really struggled to read that story.
The Hamilton stories were interesting because they start out almost as James Bond pastiche, in a world where Newton's musings took him in a very different direction, where the great powers of the 19th century have survived and still play their Great Game, while maintaining a "balance" to avoid all-out war. It feels like these stories in particular get very dark as they go on. Hamilton is a complex character, trapped by ties of loyalty and love in a very cruel world. It's easy to feel sympathy for him, and even what he does, and still be appalled at his world.
An interesting collection, with a strong authorial voice. Read if you enjoy going to dark places, but not really to my taste.
More...