mglarson29's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective slow-paced

4.0

azurite's review

Go to review page

3.0

Left me with more questions than answers. Surprisingly little focus on the creation of the RWS Tarot Cards. Inconsistent in giving Smith credit where credit is due with regards to the title of the deck (in circumstances where it would be warranted, as opposed to the publication titles used historically). Some pretty important typos with regard to Tarot symbolism and analysis of Smith’s art; e.g., Artemis is Apollo’s twin, not Aphrodite, and since when is Apollo androgynous? There’s a very big difference between a beautiful man and an androgynous person.
More...