Reviews

I actually liked this better than dracula, it was very vibey and easy to read and understand. Plus there was a lesbian vampire? From a book published in the 1800s? You can't beat it. It's so short that it's easily worth the time. It went pretty overboard describing things at times and said a few things repeatedly, which sucked because the book was already so short as is.

elemsr's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark informative mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.25

the vibes were there. the beginning was built well; interesting and mysterious. the rest of the book was rather disappointing. the reveal was boring, the plot was boring.

not sure if i would recommend

annahawes's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

jess7040's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

4 🌟

I really liked this, my only complaint is that I wish it was longer! 🩷

keraashley's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.75

A sapphic vampire is the inspiration for Dracula and I’m just now finding that out???
This book is 100 pages and honestly I wish it was longer but it tells a very haunting story in a short timeframe. Wish it was gayer.

More...