Scan barcode
kingasek_'s review
5.0
Probably the best piece of neuroscience literature I've read. Safe to say he knows what he's talking about and I'm not going to forget any of it soon.
amelia_lim's review
3.0
My problem with this book is that it used too many metaphors to explain a rather easy to understand and straightforward concept. Most of the time I find those metaphors unnecessary, I would appreciate if author takes the time and effort to explain the concept in depth rather than just throw in yet another citation. Another problem I had with this book is that it is too repetitive, same underlying concept had been repeated in several chapters, only wrapped with different fluffy words.
Overall still a fun read and I learned couple of interesting stuff. The book targets more for people who wants to takes their first step into the neuroscience wonderland.
Overall still a fun read and I learned couple of interesting stuff. The book targets more for people who wants to takes their first step into the neuroscience wonderland.
missyjohnson's review
4.0
Fascinating.
The information as to the plasticity of the brain and how it adjusts to different situations is amazing. The brain and the body abilities to adjust is very cool! I so appreciate the scientist studying this adaptive computer in our heads and coming up with innovative ideas to work with it and potential for that same adaptability of so many things in the future. Very informative read. Exciting future potential.
The information as to the plasticity of the brain and how it adjusts to different situations is amazing. The brain and the body abilities to adjust is very cool! I so appreciate the scientist studying this adaptive computer in our heads and coming up with innovative ideas to work with it and potential for that same adaptability of so many things in the future. Very informative read. Exciting future potential.
lillanaa's review
5.0
This book was received as an ARC in exchange for an honest review.
Eagleman's take here is extremely progressive, and that's far from a bad thing. The idea that the brain is the control center is nothing new, but the idea of "plug and play" is definitely a concept that I only really associated with electronics before this. It's not all that out there, we do call a motherboard the brain of the computer, but it never really occurred to me. Brain plasticity, though, makes this even easier; it's already built into the programming from day one.
From the side of someone who's more knowledgeable about technology than health this was a very intriguing concept, especially the areas discussing what we can use as inputs to be able to aid in people who are disabled. We should be having these kinds of conversations, there's no reason why we're so forcibly against any form of talk about aiding those who need help. It's in our nature not to ask for help, to try and figure things out ourselves, but these ideas are stubborn. In a sense, you could say that someone wearing glasses to help their vision is being augmented in some way (though not digitally), so what's the difference in using a cochlear implant?
Ultimately, this book was an amazing insight into how technology and the brain work together. I had my doubts at first, but the writing in this is very cohesive and easy for a layman to understand.
Eagleman's take here is extremely progressive, and that's far from a bad thing. The idea that the brain is the control center is nothing new, but the idea of "plug and play" is definitely a concept that I only really associated with electronics before this. It's not all that out there, we do call a motherboard the brain of the computer, but it never really occurred to me. Brain plasticity, though, makes this even easier; it's already built into the programming from day one.
From the side of someone who's more knowledgeable about technology than health this was a very intriguing concept, especially the areas discussing what we can use as inputs to be able to aid in people who are disabled. We should be having these kinds of conversations, there's no reason why we're so forcibly against any form of talk about aiding those who need help. It's in our nature not to ask for help, to try and figure things out ourselves, but these ideas are stubborn. In a sense, you could say that someone wearing glasses to help their vision is being augmented in some way (though not digitally), so what's the difference in using a cochlear implant?
Ultimately, this book was an amazing insight into how technology and the brain work together. I had my doubts at first, but the writing in this is very cohesive and easy for a layman to understand.
unladylike's review against another edition
3.0
2.5 stars
Livewired was more entertaining than enlightening to me, and I was really hoping for the latter. From cover to cover, Eagleman tells us anecdotes and analogies about rare deformities, recoveries from injury, and other eye-grabbing headline material. He pushes his coined terminology and website (I haven't looked at it yet, but it sounds like a Magic Eye book from the way he describes it.) as only a modern capitalistic marketer can. Towards the end of the book, he wonders why we don't have cell phones and computers that rewire themselves and adapt to new firmware and technological needs. He prophesies that future generations will look back and wonder why it took so long for our technology to mimic our malleable mammalian brains. Well, David, it's because of capitalism and systems of ethics based on interpretations of ancient religions. Overbroad and underutilized patents, manufactured obsolescence, and anthropocentric philosophies of ecology have prevented our species from understanding buttloads more about neuroscience and practical tech.
All that said, it *was* entertaining! I learned some neat things along the way, and it will be interesting to see how much I remember from it and whether the scattered lessons found in the subtext will influence me positively. For example, Eagleman explains that dreaming takes place across various parts of the brain, but the thing dreams have in common (for sighted people specifically) is the flow of images. The theory he subscribes to is that sighted people's visual cortex (which isn't immutably connected to vision) exercises its seeing abilities during our R.E.M. cycles so that they aren't weakened by neighboring capacities that compete for territory within the brain. This prompted the question within my mind: if this is so, then might listening to music or nature sounds or even white noise (or TV I suppose; yuck and blegh!) help prevent hearing loss as one's body ages?
Learning about our human brains' awesome abilities to adapt from an accessible, pop culture-level audiobook is indeed cool and useful. I just wish he had tackled some of the more difficult questions, like how and why our memory is *creative* (as in, we frequently make false memories and firmly believe them, as can be seen in studies of police line-ups), or how a grown-ass trans woman like myself might intentionally "livewire" my brain to change deeply engrained personality traits or habits. Actually, he doesn't get into differences between male and female or cis and trans brains, which is rather surprising, given psychologists' (white hetero cis men primarily) predilection with those subjects.
One of David Eagleman's other books, [b:Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives|4948826|Sum Forty Tales from the Afterlives|David Eagleman|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1320528453l/4948826._SY75_.jpg|5014561], was recommended to me by my mom, which is what prompted me to read Livewired (the library only has two audiobooks by him, and this one, published in 2020, became available to listen to at work). I'll give him another chance and certainly digest more material on contemporary neuroplasticity science, but the overall methodology of this book did not impress me.
Livewired was more entertaining than enlightening to me, and I was really hoping for the latter. From cover to cover, Eagleman tells us anecdotes and analogies about rare deformities, recoveries from injury, and other eye-grabbing headline material. He pushes his coined terminology and website (I haven't looked at it yet, but it sounds like a Magic Eye book from the way he describes it.) as only a modern capitalistic marketer can. Towards the end of the book, he wonders why we don't have cell phones and computers that rewire themselves and adapt to new firmware and technological needs. He prophesies that future generations will look back and wonder why it took so long for our technology to mimic our malleable mammalian brains. Well, David, it's because of capitalism and systems of ethics based on interpretations of ancient religions. Overbroad and underutilized patents, manufactured obsolescence, and anthropocentric philosophies of ecology have prevented our species from understanding buttloads more about neuroscience and practical tech.
All that said, it *was* entertaining! I learned some neat things along the way, and it will be interesting to see how much I remember from it and whether the scattered lessons found in the subtext will influence me positively. For example, Eagleman explains that dreaming takes place across various parts of the brain, but the thing dreams have in common (for sighted people specifically) is the flow of images. The theory he subscribes to is that sighted people's visual cortex (which isn't immutably connected to vision) exercises its seeing abilities during our R.E.M. cycles so that they aren't weakened by neighboring capacities that compete for territory within the brain. This prompted the question within my mind: if this is so, then might listening to music or nature sounds or even white noise (or TV I suppose; yuck and blegh!) help prevent hearing loss as one's body ages?
Learning about our human brains' awesome abilities to adapt from an accessible, pop culture-level audiobook is indeed cool and useful. I just wish he had tackled some of the more difficult questions, like how and why our memory is *creative* (as in, we frequently make false memories and firmly believe them, as can be seen in studies of police line-ups), or how a grown-ass trans woman like myself might intentionally "livewire" my brain to change deeply engrained personality traits or habits. Actually, he doesn't get into differences between male and female or cis and trans brains, which is rather surprising, given psychologists' (white hetero cis men primarily) predilection with those subjects.
One of David Eagleman's other books, [b:Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives|4948826|Sum Forty Tales from the Afterlives|David Eagleman|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1320528453l/4948826._SY75_.jpg|5014561], was recommended to me by my mom, which is what prompted me to read Livewired (the library only has two audiobooks by him, and this one, published in 2020, became available to listen to at work). I'll give him another chance and certainly digest more material on contemporary neuroplasticity science, but the overall methodology of this book did not impress me.