aceinit's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

I've had a mediocre run of luck with anthologies lately, and this one is no exception. Though the setting and subject matter appealed to me deeply, and quite a few of my favorite authors are included, there simply weren't enough standout entries in here to make the collection memorable.

The standout entries were, for me, "The Unwanted Women of Surrey," "Phosphorous," and my personal favorite "Charged," all of which can be found in the middle of the collection. "The Vital Importance of the Superficial," was another intriguing entry, but the passive narrative structure of a story told entirely in letters took some of the enjoyment out of it.

What surprised me was that the one thing I really didn't like about this series was one of the ideas I thought would be most appealing: the taking of a classic character or work or literature from that time period, and re-imagining it with a twist. There are alternate takes on Frankenstein, alternate takes on Ebeneezer Scrooge, the Bronte siblings, the Queen herself, and even a certain consulting detective. But all of these stories fell almost flat for me, for reasons I can't quite put my finger on.

I expected more from this collection...a series of stories to captivate and intrigue in a way reminiscent of the dramatically changing time in which they were set. In that respect, only "Charged" and "Phosphorous," which dealt with the innovation of electricity and the forgotten horrors of the industrial revolution, respectively, met those expectations. Instead, what I found were a series of stories that were quite tedious to read. There were many times I wanted to skip ahead to the next entry, more than I can recall in any other anthology I've read. I was quite frankly, bored with most of the stories. Perhaps some of this is my fault for having such high expectations...but given the contributors and how strong I know their storytelling skills can be, I am particularly disappointed.

lsparrow's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

an interesting collection of short stories - retellings of familiar victorian stories and characters.

cosmith2015's review against another edition

Go to review page

I really enjoyed on the first two stories. I couldn't complete one story and the other 5 or 6 I read I felt blah about. I DNF'd about half way through the book.

I was hoping for much more.. fairy's and magic.

tinynavajo's review

Go to review page

4.0

A world of stempunk, fantasy, science fiction, and delight is centered in "Queen Victora's Book of Spells." If you like Gail Carrier, A. W. Exley, or any other Victorian authors, I suggest you pick up this anthology and start reading.

toastam's review

Go to review page

3.0

Great anthology, some of the stories were more riveting than others, as is the case with any collection of separate works. I actually didn't get to finish this because my ILL due date came up and I've got so much else I want to read but I'm definitely more into the genre now.

mehitabels's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

An absolutely wonderful collection - some losers, but overall a very wonderful bunch. Let me to another group of writers previously unknown, and more more more books on my wishlist . . .

tmleblanc's review

Go to review page

3.0

Over the last several weeks I've been reviewing all the short stories presented in Queen Victoria's Book of Spells: An Anthology of Gaslamp Fantasy edited by Ellen Datlow and Terri Windling. Please visit my blog to read a review of each of the stories.

Review #1 | Review #2 | Review #3 | Review #4 | Summary Review

meritorius_mage's review

Go to review page

dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

rebeccacider's review

Go to review page

3.0

Maybe I just had overly high expectations for a "gaslamp fantasy" anthology edited by Datlow, but I thought this book was good, not great, though I've enjoyed many of the contributing authors in the past. I did really like the titular story by Delia Sherman and the Sorcery and Cecilia-esque offering by Ellen Kushner and Caroline Stevermer.

merbearmer's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

3.5.