Scan barcode
atticmoth's review
3.0
It may sound weird to criticize a 600 page anthology for being limited in scope, but there it is. My poet father gifted be The Ecopoetry Anthology in an attempt to get me interested in poets that aren’t Mary Oliver — historically, I have only liked poetry that’s very easy to understand, as I am not a poet myself. For the past year or so this book has been my bedside reading; I have found the only way I can enjoy poetry is if I read one every morning and every night, which is why I feel sort of justified in reviewing something so encyclopedic. There is a lot of good stuff in here, but the editing just seemed weirdly low-effort and claimed to be more authoritative than it really was. Firstly, it is only specified in small print on the back that this is a uniquely American anthology, something which I consider both arbitrary and a mistake. This is not to say that the poets selected were not diverse; the editors made an effort to include works by indigenous and minority poets, but all American. The real lack of diversity is temporal. The first section of the book, on “Historical” poetry, starts in the 1800s with Whitman’s “Song of Myself” and is pretty much arranged chronologically until the 1990s. This, to me, is a missed opportunity to include the wealth of nature writing from other cultures and temporal milieux. Where are Bashō’s haikus? Where is Homer’s wine-dark sea and rosy-fingered dawn? Shakespeare’s “mickle is the powerful grace that lies / In herbs, plants, stones, and their true qualities”, the Popul Vuh’s account of the creation of the world, the wealth of poetic tradition from Ancient Greece or China? It just seems kind of lame to leave all of this out because it’s not as glamorous as the new. And the vast majority, over 400 pages of the book, is devoted to “Contemporary” poetry (in alphabetical order), a lot of which is great, but a lot which was skippable and made me wonder at the reasoning behind its inclusion. Frankly, a more historical assemblage of ecopoetry would have provided a more interesting survey of the development of ecological and environmental thought throughout time, through a poetic lens, which is something I would absolutely go crazy for. But this isn’t that, and I’m not sure if it even exists yet.
More...