Scan barcode
mh_books's review against another edition
2.0
However the writing (I won't say prose, there is none) is amateurish and dull, the dialogue unconvincing, and the characters two dimensional and not credible. I rarely give a very harsh review but I honestly think that this author has all the elements of a good novella but absolutely no writing ability to put it together.
In fairness now, my review is contrary to nearly everyone else's and I guess this novella may be lost in translation somewhat and only American audiences get it? That may explain my hate of the dialogue from the get-go? So a book that is very much for others just not for me?
However I still have to say, I will not be reading any more of her work and I am still looking out for good female horror writers. In the vein of [a:Samanta Schweblin|2898936|Samanta Schweblin|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1545389695p2/2898936.jpg], [a:Shirley Jackson|13388|Shirley Jackson|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1550251468p2/13388.jpg] and [a:Michelle Paver|119755|Michelle Paver|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1243618873p2/119755.jpg].
Apols for the grumpy guss review - I am so in the minority on this one!
sade's review against another edition
1.0
❤
I geniunely believe horror is one of the hardest genre for writers' to pull off. I also geniunely believe that if a book is scary, you will know.
This book is described as "horror fiction" and i don't know if whoever wrote that blurb was having a laugh or the person for real believed that this book...this book i just read is horror.
❤❤
For what purpose this book was written i don't know. If the writer was trying to get across the message of soldiers suffering from PTSD after war this was, i can't even lie, a very weird really weird way to go about it.
❤
If you're looking for a short scary book to read. This isn't the book.
If you're looking for a book with some sort of crazy psychological exploit into the mind of someone suffering from PTSD, again, THIS IS NOT THE BOOK.
Basically me at the end of this book:
The only "horror" in this book is the "horror" of being labelled as one.
kovax's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
mrfrank's review against another edition
4.0
I found myself drawn through this story quickly. At the outset, I turned the pages out of interest in the characters and their relationship. By the middle of the story I was turning the pages, anxious for the monster to reveal itself. In the end, I was turning the pages in horror not wanting to read what I knew was inevitable.
A glorious read. I haven't been whisked though a story out of necessity to find out how it plays out in quite some time. It's a nice feeling and yet the story is dark. This one will definitely dance on my psyche for awhile. I'm sure I'll get the chills when I can feel again.
gay's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.5
bloodinthesigil's review against another edition
4.0
casimiera's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
3.0
echoscreaming's review against another edition
5.0
This is a deep, tragic, heartbreaking look into PTSD. Psycholgical horrors manifest physically. Hope is a pinhole, despair engulfs, emotion becomes monstrous.
Rachel Autumn Deering's writing is beautiful, her characters live and breathe. Mid-paragraph POV shifts lend the story an immediacy which verges on stream-of-conscious. I'm very much looking forward to whatever she writes next.
motherhorror's review
4.0
Look for my review, soon!
Recommended for fans of dark, psychological, emotional horror packed into 100+ pages.
amandaquotidianbooks's review
3.0