Scan barcode
fernicanus's review against another edition
challenging
dark
informative
reflective
sad
medium-paced
4.0
yorgos_a's review against another edition
5.0
An absolute must-read, especially if you work in human genetic variation like me. Apart from providing a thorough account of the origins of race science, the author does a great job helping us realise how racist discourse can infiltrate seemingly innocuous scientific research. This book should become an obligatory read at school. Highly recommended
onlyonebookshelf's review against another edition
informative
reflective
medium-paced
4.5
Content Warnings
Moderate: Racism and Genocide
softiereads's review against another edition
5.0
Crazy look into how “race science” has persisted, really deconstructs how we look at race and what it means and doesn’t mean
hollyleaf's review against another edition
challenging
informative
reflective
fast-paced
5.0
Fantastic and important book. I'd read Inferior in 2020, on the same theme but around sexism, and have been meaning to get around to this one since finding out it existed. As frustrating a read as the first, in that brilliant, important way.
I feel more than slightly validated in my belief that all fields of study need to be interdisciplinary. I have mostly being saying this about history, as historians are consistently tricked by misunderstanding or abuse of statistics, but the refrain throughout this book is the failure of this entire scientific field to even consider that the answer to these inequalities come not from biology but from sociology and history. They keep returning to the same issue over and over again because they have a hammer and insist that race is a nail. They are almost like flat earthers in the sense that it doesn't matter how many times they prove themselves wrong, they are determined that race is a biological rather than sociological reality, and insist that with just a little more research they will be able to prove it even with the mounting body of evidence to the contrary.
The damage they cause, even when their research is well-intentioned, is sustaining a strain of ideological thought that ought to be dead ten times over. The horror that comes from this is not history, it is present reality.
I feel more than slightly validated in my belief that all fields of study need to be interdisciplinary. I have mostly being saying this about history, as historians are consistently tricked by misunderstanding or abuse of statistics, but the refrain throughout this book is the failure of this entire scientific field to even consider that the answer to these inequalities come not from biology but from sociology and history. They keep returning to the same issue over and over again because they have a hammer and insist that race is a nail. They are almost like flat earthers in the sense that it doesn't matter how many times they prove themselves wrong, they are determined that race is a biological rather than sociological reality, and insist that with just a little more research they will be able to prove it even with the mounting body of evidence to the contrary.
The damage they cause, even when their research is well-intentioned, is sustaining a strain of ideological thought that ought to be dead ten times over. The horror that comes from this is not history, it is present reality.