alexgrapp's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative mysterious reflective medium-paced

3.0

bigs2021's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Disappointing

This book was recommended by one of my paranormal podcasts. It is not a bad book by any means, but I was surprised at how basic this was. It read more like a New Yorker article (not necessarily a bad thing!) and seemed overlong. I almost never skim or skip, but boy I had to skim through some areas. The writing is good and the author is intelligent, clearly, but what was the point? By the last part of the book, I felt it had better hit its stride, but the sort of cheesy and very personal ending (sorry!) didn’t speak to me. There are so many great introductions to this concept or ones like it, and the sort of non-scholarly almost journalistic approach really hinders this, I think. For an amazing start, read Authors of the Impossible by Kripal. For a much deeper exploration, check out The Occult by Wilson.

I wanted to like this, I really did! And the idea is cool, but I just didn’t learn much or take away much from this beyond the idea itself. I think we need to have a higher standard going forward so that we do not simply rehash what has been stated over and over, but to push into new areas and deeper understanding.

slanderoid's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative inspiring mysterious reflective medium-paced

4.5

breadandmushrooms's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative lighthearted medium-paced

3.0

noctivagantpodcast's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging slow-paced

5.0

havoc818's review against another edition

Go to review page

Was hoping for communicating with ghosts, got aiming for a real life Frankenstein 

trickster_wolfe's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative inspiring mysterious slow-paced

4.5

bigs2021's review

Go to review page

2.0

Disappointing

This book was recommended by one of my paranormal podcasts. It is not a bad book by any means, but I was surprised at how basic this was. It read more like a New Yorker article (not necessarily a bad thing!) and seemed overlong. I almost never skim or skip, but boy I had to skim through some areas. The writing is good and the author is intelligent, clearly, but what was the point? By the last part of the book, I felt it had better hit its stride, but the sort of cheesy and very personal ending (sorry!) didn’t speak to me. There are so many great introductions to this concept or ones like it, and the sort of non-scholarly almost journalistic approach really hinders this, I think. For an amazing start, read Authors of the Impossible by Kripal. For a much deeper exploration, check out The Occult by Wilson.

I wanted to like this, I really did! And the idea is cool, but I just didn’t learn much or take away much from this beyond the idea itself. I think we need to have a higher standard going forward so that we do not simply rehash what has been stated over and over, but to push into new areas and deeper understanding.

allisonthurman's review

Go to review page

4.0

Not exactly what I expected it to be. I was looking for something about the hacked audio equipment used to listen to "ghost voices" back in the 1970s, and while it does contain this there's also discussion of nineteenth-century mediumship as technology and hacking as spirituality. Hard for me to hammer out in to words, but it's definitely given me some other avenues to research.
More...