Reviews

A Clash of Kings by George R.R. Martin

bjoern's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional funny tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

schnatti's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark tense
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated

4.0

nongshaw's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

oh yeah

yaakovakiva's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

BETTER than the first. I can't even imagine where these stories are headed, because each of them has headed off in a direction I couldn't even have really anticipated. Love the characters, found myself genuinely surprised at a few points, and I continue to worry about everyone like they're my own. Dany was my favorite storyline in the first book and her story really fell short this time, while Bran and Tyrion remain favorites.

I also can't wait to see if the second season of HBO's Game of Thrones lives up to this book. Woo!

bborys's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

ralfcazam's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

If your read the first one (A Game of Thrones), and liked it, then you should definetley read this one. It has the same continuous intrigue and multitude of characters. It also stays true to the lack of character invincubility. The main characters actually have a strong tendency to die (or at the very least be sorely wounded). It is well written and all in all a very good book.

cmehende's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

ceevadee's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

josiahadams's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

In fantasy series, you'll often see a steep decline in quality from the first to second novels. In a Clash of Kings, that is absolutely not the case. GRRM spins an all-encompassing tale that builds on the previous novel, including new POVs and worldbuilding, and leaves the reader yearning for A Storm of Swords.
The thing that stands out about A Game of Thrones is the political intrigue, and that component remains a large part in the second novel. The introduction of new factions like the Iron Islands and Highgarden fastens in new interesting plotlines that result in drastic consequences; additionally, in a ACOK, GRRM includes large-scale warfare that was absent from the first novel.
Now let's talk about the characters.
I enjoyed every POV in this novel, but my favorite storylines were a toss-up between these four: Theon, Davos/Tyrion, and Sansa. Theon is one of the more underrated characters in the books, and while he does get his flowers later down the line, alot of his characterization is glossed over in this novel. His internal struggle between Balon and Robb paints him as an increasingly complex character who is aware of his every action, but is blinded by the false promise of love. I enjoyed Davos mainly because we get to see Stannis through his POV. Stannis Baratheon... what a depiction of a king. Absolutely unwavering in his justice, I found myself rooting for Stannis throughout the entire novel. With Tyrion, we continue to see the dynamics between him and his family, and also a frontline depiction of the Blackwater. The fourth character is Sansa, who was admittedly quite annoying in the first novel. However, her slow-burning development as she treads the palaces of King's Landing is incredible. Gone is the naive and unburdened girl we saw at the start of the series. Sansa has begun her ascension towards womanhood, and as a lady of House Stark.
GRRM also includes several new aspects of the 'fantasy' element into ACOK; Melisandre being the cog that details the strange and dark magic of Westeros, and Daenerys' continued conquest in the East proves the absolute power that dragons wield in the current day. Unlike alot of series, GRRM does not place too much emphasis on the magic trope, which I greatly appreciate.
Next, the Battle of the Blackwater.
The show does not do Tyrion justice; the little man can fight! Blackwater also proves Tyrion's incredible intellect. Without Tyrion, the power dynamic of this world would look quite different. I enjoyed GRRM's depictions of the battle, and the tiny details that the show left out, such as the ships creating a bridge to the shore and Tyrion dropping the chain. The battle made for an incredibly engaging read.
Overall, A Clash of Kings only builds upon the success of the first novel, leading most readers urging to pick up the third installment. Looking back on the greatness of this novel, it is a little crazy in retrospect to realize that this novel was largely just a build-up towards A Storm of Swords; and what a build-up it was.
10/10.

eliamay's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Some Arya chapters were very hard to read (lots of war crimes in the Riverlands).