Reviews

Nameless by Grant Morrison, Simon Bowland, Nathan Fairbairn, Chris Burnham

matthewthe38th's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious fast-paced

3.5

Just take it one page at a time. Be sure to read the author's notes at the end. Very graphic, cosmic horror.

christophehermans's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

An acid trip graphic novel with amazing (though very macabre) artwork. The lore and world building here is similar to Lovecraft, the setting and atmosphere are eerily similar to Event Horizon, and the story structure is reminiscent of Shutter Island. Highly recommended. I will require a reread at some point.

erasmios's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Nameless is an interesting if somewhat uneven mixture of three ingredients: Hollywood action blockbuster, epic cosmic horror gorefest and pulp magazine dialogue. The confusing story was fine and I found the artwork quite unsettling, but I don't like how Chris Burnham draws faces. There were several cool ideas I really liked, but the overall presentation was too pulpy. It felt like Michael Bay trying to be Christopher Nolan. Before Nameless I'd read only one graphic novel, Batman: Arkham Asylum, by Grant Morrison so I can't really compare this one with his other works.

mattlibrarian's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

rollforlibrarian's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

The last few graphic novels I've read have been seriously hit and miss. Still. I did actually finish this one. Not all were so lucky.

unladylike's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Nameless brings back all the elements I first loved about Grant Morrison comic stories. If you loved Invisibles, in particular, or any number of '90s sci-fi/supernatural horror films or books by [a:Michael Crichton|5194|Michael Crichton|https://d.gr-assets.com/authors/1359042651p2/5194.jpg], you might love losing your mind to this shit.

thebigness's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

It's Grant Morrison so I expected it to read like the fevered dreams of someone coming down off an acid trip and that's exactly what I got. While in the past I have enjoyed this kind of writing from Morrison this one felt like it was forced on me; like he was leaning a little too heavily on his reputation to get this thing sold.

This manic kind of writing Morrison does where he just jumps in somewhere that has no context and starts spewing characters and their names and their interactions with each other like we're all friends and this is normal of this guy is exhausting to follow. Unlike the Invisibles or Doom Patrol where the series was long enough for the story arc to unfold and reveal itself, this one was incredibly short and too dense. Morrison's ideas are bat shit crazy but they need more space to pay off. Without this space it is hard to care about any of these characters (and there are a lot of them, and they come at you fast).

theesotericcamel's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This was a dark and pessimistic graphic novel to read indeed. A lot of the plot is taken from left-handed path magick and Nihilistic Philosophy. And I knew that wading into the the story beforehand. The art is clearly inspired by the Linge Claire art style, as exemplified by Hergé and Mobius. It graces the story very nicely, in my humble opinion. The story is supposed to be about how the Aeon of Horus segues into the Aeon of Maat. The image of Horus as a violent Aeon is right, but I would argue that the way his sister has taken over is equally as violent. Still a lot of current and complex magickal ideas are tackled in this story and I respect it for that.

morninglightmountain's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

beefmaster's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

GMo doing his magician thing.