Scan barcode
henry_michael03's review against another edition
challenging
funny
informative
reflective
tense
slow-paced
3.0
casparb's review against another edition
4.0
Ok spicy ones! I was looking forward to Timaeus and wasn't disappointed. Critias I read on a whim, as it continues from T.
So I'm thinking mostly of Timaeus here. I think it's the text which makes Plato the most difficult to reconcile with for Christian orthodoxies a few centuries later. But there are plenty of shared ideas with contemporary Jewish metaphysics, it seems to me. Certainly the image of the Demiurge and the immortal as fiery circles brought to mind the apparition of angels in the blazing opening of Ezekiel.
Critias is mostly about Atlantis - for those that weren't aware, these dialogues are (I think?) the originary sources on the topic. This is why depictions of Atlantis in pop culture tend to have a Grecian aesthetic. I think Critias would be most fruitfully read against the Republic? It wasn't the more riveting of the two.
The metaphysics of Timaeus are an awful lot. Was impressed. There are passages here that I see in very contemporary philosophy - 'being is to becoming what truth is to belief'.
We are circles upon circles. O you who turn the wheel etc etc. The divine form. EZ again: I will overturn, overturn, overturn.
The text is rather down on women in more peculiar ways than we are accustomed to from texts of its type: 'He who lived well would return to his native star, and would there have a blessed existence; but, if he lived ill, he would pass into the nature of a woman, and if he did not then alter his evil ways, into the likeness of some animal'. Besides this being frankly bizarre, I think one could draw interesting inferences about gender from the conception of 'woman as purgatory'.
So I'm thinking mostly of Timaeus here. I think it's the text which makes Plato the most difficult to reconcile with for Christian orthodoxies a few centuries later. But there are plenty of shared ideas with contemporary Jewish metaphysics, it seems to me. Certainly the image of the Demiurge and the immortal as fiery circles brought to mind the apparition of angels in the blazing opening of Ezekiel.
Critias is mostly about Atlantis - for those that weren't aware, these dialogues are (I think?) the originary sources on the topic. This is why depictions of Atlantis in pop culture tend to have a Grecian aesthetic. I think Critias would be most fruitfully read against the Republic? It wasn't the more riveting of the two.
The metaphysics of Timaeus are an awful lot. Was impressed. There are passages here that I see in very contemporary philosophy - 'being is to becoming what truth is to belief'.
We are circles upon circles. O you who turn the wheel etc etc. The divine form. EZ again: I will overturn, overturn, overturn.
The text is rather down on women in more peculiar ways than we are accustomed to from texts of its type: 'He who lived well would return to his native star, and would there have a blessed existence; but, if he lived ill, he would pass into the nature of a woman, and if he did not then alter his evil ways, into the likeness of some animal'. Besides this being frankly bizarre, I think one could draw interesting inferences about gender from the conception of 'woman as purgatory'.
maya_moksha's review against another edition
reflective
medium-paced
3.0
Interesting experience. Insightful. Reflective. Slower middle. Will read again with another translator. Be prepared for an abrupt ending/drop-off, as the text is incomplete/missing.
dear_old_world's review against another edition
slow-paced
2.5
The theological sections were most interesting - I skimmed the bits science has debunked. Atlantis section is historically interesting
trisha_thomas's review against another edition
1.0
Thank goodness for Project Gutenberg. Had I not needed this for a challenge, I never would have even attempted to read this one. It's a slog - even though it's short, it's not an easy breezy read. It feels incomplete, rambles and is just not my kind of read.
Oh well. On to the next!
Oh well. On to the next!
sarahalfa's review against another edition
4.0
‘the god wanted everything to be good, marred by as little imperfection as possible’