Scan barcode
bkeving_74's review against another edition
3.0
The book is okay as far as logic and Socratic questioning go. However Socrates’ premise or foundation in my opinion is faulty as well as the idea that his logic can only prove conclusion he has drawn. What I’ve read is a belief system that includes an element of Gnosticism, and a premise that philosophy is the way to salvation, again another man made idea that man’s efforts are what lead to salvation or damnation.
pr_load's review
3.0
Phaedo is a bit, unlike the other Socratic dialogues. Here Plato really lays out his theory of the forms while simultaneously detailing Socrates' last day hanging out and conversing with his friends. They discuss issues about death, and how the soul is necessarily immortal, and the end is a bit sad as he drinks his cup of hemlock poison and lays down to die. One thing I found particularly interesting was the discussion where Socrates describes his disillusionment with the natural sciences at their inability to give him the real reason behind things. He finds all their answers to be merely descriptors of what's going on, and not really getting at the heart of the issue. The real answers he says are found in philosophy.
henry_michael03's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
hopeful
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
4.0
afeednazir's review against another edition
4.0
"Phaedo" by Plato earns four stars for its profound exploration of philosophical concepts, particularly the nature of the soul and the immortality of the soul. The dialogue format engages readers, and Plato's skillful use of Socratic questioning stimulates thought. However, the dense prose may pose a challenge for some readers, and a prior understanding of Greek philosophy enhances appreciation. Overall, a thought-provoking and intellectually enriching read that warrants four stars.