Reviews

Spock Messiah by Theodore R. Cogswell

baroquecowboy's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.5

it’s definitely not a high point for the bantam star trek books, and honestly i would recommend skipping it

ogreart's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Read February 1979.

deranged_pegasus's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

A highly surprising ending makes this book am excellent addition to any library. The idea behind dops is ingenious and a curious future should the idea prove a reality.

batbones's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

The incredulity of the story line was partially ameliorated by several clever twists. It even became quite funny, albeit, non-intentionally.

thebeardedpoet's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

The book is marred greatly by the sexist attitudes and awful treatment of Ensign George. Aside from that major problem, the scenes of dialogue between Kirk and McCoy are well handled and faithful to the characters. Also both Scotty and Chekhov are in character here as well. The concept that Spock has been contaminated by the mind of a delusional messiah gets old after awhile, unfortunately. Due to his take-over this book has hardly any characterization of Spock that anyone would recognize, and for much of the action he is off stage.

srgower's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

It's not good. I'll leave it at that.

msbananananner's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny fast-paced

2.75

sharkbait220's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny lighthearted
  • Loveable characters? Yes

3.0

kmsmith2425's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious reflective tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

thomcat's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

Unabashedly sexist and equally awful, I finished this in case there was a plot I could use in a Star Trek RPG. Worse than most fan fiction. Not recommended.

I had purchased a few of the Bantam line (which came out before the numbered Pocketbook series), but not this one, which for some reason was hard to find. Did not read it when I did find it - just couldn't spare two hours. Now that I have - I'll only keep it for completeness.