Reviews

Batman: Year 100 (2006-) #1 by Paul Pope

rashthedoctor's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

This was a fantastic concept , a dystopian future set 100 years ahead of present day DC universe , with a Batman now re appearing , to solve a murder and in turn find a hidden conspiracy. 

It was all so good in terms of the plot , the new team , new scene , new world it was all just right but then the art style completely messed it up for me , the extra jarring sketches and gloom filled colors made me feel a pseudo orbital pain while reading . 

Add to that the many plot points that were left unexplained andmany points that were too confusing to understand. One thing though the action was absolutely top notch .

Over all , its a fantastic book , but you will have to tolerate the art and ignore a few things 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

boneyking's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

A dystopian, Orwellian vision of Gotham City, and a realistic, human Batman. It's like they read my mind and made the Batman novel I've always wanted.

mattnauwelaers's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

A satisfying read with incredible art that cures the pain of Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

nkives's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Very odd Batman story where Batman looks like he is so old, you might actually thing he has been dead for a few years, and yet he is still running around being Batman.

cathartibae's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Paul Pope is God

stilldirty's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Loved this, but initially thought (wrongly) that it would just be a weird concept and not worth my time. This whole thing was cleverly orchestrated into a very sharp piece of Batman reading. I'm going to accept it into my personal idea of Batman canon.

dozmuttz's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Uhhhhhh okay. 2.5-
So this was a pretty interesting read, however it wasn't what I thought it would be. In "Batman: Year 100" we get a look into the year 2039. 100 years after the first sighting of the original caped crusader. In this future the Batman is still roaming the streets, only this time around we don't know who's donning the cowl. We can presume its not the original Bruce Wayne as this story follows real life continuity, so Bruce Wayne would be 130 years old. And this Batman is still young and kicking ass. The overall story is cool but in only 4 issues, this story felt uninteresting and lost some momentum in the 2nd and 3rd issues. Paul Pope does both the writing and artwork and I for sure think that the artwork is the strong suit of the book, mainly when he actually has some action scenes and not just a bunch of people talking in a room or just two people having a conversation. The ending was also kind of annoying as we never really find out what's happening with this Batman of the future. A lot of questions are left unanswered and not in a way where its ambiguous, just kinda bland and annoying. Lot of potential in this story but fell short in my opinion.

bluenicorn's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Good art, good story... I like the idea of a future dystopian Gotham City. And no real explanation for why Bruce Wayne is still around- that appeals to me.

battibatt's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I picked it up because I loved the imagery of a fanged, snarling Batman.

The art style wasn't something I would usually be interested in, but it really fits the vibe of the story. However, and maybe this is because I haven't read much batman in a decade, but I found parts of the story a little difficult to follow.

Overall I liked the combination of Edgy but Detective that I expect in Batman. I didn't rate it higher because I wanted a more well-rounded story.

northern_mint's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

This is truly some of the ugliest art I've ever seen. It reminds me of that ugly art you see in cartoons that is used for comedic effect. I guess if you already like Paul Pope that you know what you're getting into and some people I gather like it. To each their own I guess. The premise is fun but isn't fleshed out or explained. The plot ends up being a generic cyberpunk story as a result. And I guess Bruce Wayne is just immortal. It also isn't very batmany. You could have replaced Batman with anyone and it would change absolutely nothing.