Reviews

Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation by Amartya Sen

teokajlibroj's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

A very interesting theory that changed the way I think about famines. However, the book itself is somewhat technical and dull.

hades9stages's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

amartya sen… unique point of view and super inspiring compared to lots of other authors on this topics. probably the best to read for famines, especially related to british imperialism. i cite sen (and i see sen cited) a lot on essays

shiradest's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Once again, a book for which I was sure that I'd written a review, probably because I cited it so often during my PhD work which eventually became my MPhil thesis.

I found these notes from 2008, and am posting them with just a tiny bit of clean up:

As I look back over Senn’s 1981 ‘Poverty and Famines’ after yet another argument, back in 2008, with my nice Thai office mate on why America is not in fact the Land of Opportunity if you start off poor, I see again what hit me when I first arrived at the University of Bath.

Middle class people really don’t get it. My office mate keeps saying ‘just work hard and you’ll get a job’ but can’t fathom the lack of opportunities for people who have no connections and no home or family on which to fall back.

Senn likewise documents the lack of resources and opportunities that play in with the system of entitlements in famines to ensure that the wealthy and middle classes tend not to suffer much, but the poor suffer by falling further into destitution or even starving to death. This is something I found myself thinking as I read ‘well, duh’ -it’s obvious to someone who lives among poor people because it’s all around the poor and the working classes. But to someone living in a house the next block over, with an office or a shop to tend to daily, it may not be so obvious. Just like an academic presenting ‘findings’ showing that the poor in England (lone mothers in that seminar) were better off if they had both a job and child care support. Well, duh. Why is this not immediately obvious to begin with? Because people with connections can’t imagine not having them. Or something. I’m not sure. It looks clear to me that people who’ve never missed a meal (as my older Chinese former roommate pointed out about the younger students, saying “they can’t understand because they haven’t suffered”), like my office mate, can’t understand the difficulties of people who weren’t blessed with such luck.

Let’s make more luck for all of us, together.

tobito's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

amartya sen… unique point of view and super inspiring compared to lots of other authors on this topics. probably the best to read for famines, especially related to british imperialism. i cite sen (and i see sen cited) a lot on essays
More...