Scan barcode
breadandmushrooms's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? N/A
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A
3.0
savazelena's review
4.0
Sunrise is a collection of short stories with a focus on nuclear energy and it's effect on generations of Japanese women. Each of them is wonderful in itself, but I really appreciated the small connecting elements. Some of them are realistic, some magical, the writing style made to fit each individual one, from strictly factual to poetic.
Overall, a wonderful read. I really enjoyed reading the translator's note as well - I'm the type of reader who will have an existential crisis about not understanding what the author truly meant because I don't speak their language and ideas are hard to translate, so notes like this make me a little more trusting towards the translation.
bookmaddie's review
3.5
Graphic: Fire/Fire injury, Suicide, and Suicidal thoughts
emsemsems's review
3.0
‘In the background, the Glenn Miller Orchestra played ‘Moonlight Serenade.’ I later learned that the song on the original record’s B-side was called ‘Sunrise Serenade.’ I also learned that as the world’s first nuclear bomb went off at the Trinity Site in New Mexico, the radio played that very song.’
The style of writing is very similar to Kobayashi’s other book, [b:Trinity, Trinity, Trinity|59387725|Trinity, Trinity, Trinity|Erika Kobayashi|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1639128503l/59387725._SY75_.jpg|90465809]. I am not particularly excited when it comes to her ‘dialogues’ (and/or the ways in which the characters interact with one another in general) which really ‘challenged’ my attention span like it did in her other book. Actually, some parts do remind me of Mieko Kawakami’s narrative style, so if you’re into that, you might be into this. And despite not being able to appreciate this book the way it probably deserves to be, I do actually like it considerably more than her other work.
‘If I’m going to die from a bomb dropped on me, I’d like to at least not have it be during my period!’
‘All that spent money, all that shed blood – dark blood smeared on sanitary napkins, on toilet bowls, on silver forceps, on absorbent cotton – her heart beat fast at the thought of it all. At any rate, she needed to calm down.’
‘Every woman wants to stay young and beautiful, no matter how old she is. You’re too young to know now, but you’ll find out.’
This is the kind of book that I’m afraid I’ll be too cocky and impulsive to attempt to read in Japanese just because I know I am only but slightly acquainted with the language. Kobayashi’s book is not even easy to digest in English. Not to say that the translation work is questionable by any means, on the contrary – I think it’s impressive how the translator was able to translate her work so brilliantly. From the ‘afterword’, I can tell that the translator greatly admires and respects Kobayashi’s work, which only makes me more certain that this is a ‘me problem’ – I’m not reading this well enough.
‘The white towers of Hikarigaoka waste processing plant rose into the sky before us. A song started playing on the radio. “This is ‘Welcome to New York,’ by Taylor Swift from her album 1989.’’ 1989, the year Taylor Swift was born. The year the Showa Emperor died. The year I met Quartz.’
I feel like I need to talk about ‘Quartz’. This allegedly ‘ageless’ pretty boy who goes around kissing girls and telling them that every time he ‘blesses’ them with one of his kisses, their ‘lifespan’ is extended by one extra year (which doesn’t make any sense to me, but magical realism or whatever I guess), telling them they’ll remain young and beautiful if they fucked. Either worst character ever, or best character ever, I don’t know. I am not ‘getting’ what he symbolises. It’s just perverse/kinky absurdism to me, but not in a particularly interesting or exciting way. Don Juan, with a fucking stick of immortality. Maybe again I’m just not ‘getting’ what Kobayashi is trying to convey/express with such a character.
Admittedly, I wanted to like this book more than I was able to. Perhaps because I received the review copy around the same time as the G7 summit thing happened. And I thought this must be some kind of cheeky coincidence. But unfortunately, the writing did not really resonate with me. And I even wondered if it’s too demanding of me as a reader to be annoyed at Kobayashi for referencing Virginia Woolf in her book? Because the only thing she mentioned of Woolf was of her suicide note, which really, is kind of disappointing to say the least. It’s the same when other writers/artists talk about Sylvia Plath and utilise hers for their art. Am I just being overly sensitive about this because Woolf happens to be one of my favourite writers, and her death is literally the least interesting thing about her.
Although I seem to harbour only lukewarm feelings for the book, I still think I wouldn’t mind reading Kobayahi’s future writing/work if given the chance to do so. The setting and descriptions – the general presentation/structure of the writing is quite pretty though, but something about it lacks a sense of cohesion (to me). Everything is just a little too subtle for me to fully appreciate. Maybe it’s really a ‘me problem’. The concluding chapter describing a visit to ‘Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant’ was a particularly interesting one (for me at least – especially the bit where the narrator makes a list of the names of the surviving/thriving plants and trees in the area). But I don’t know if I feel this way only because of my previous readings about the ‘real-life events’ which had obviously left an impression on me that I still can’t quite begin to describe properly.
‘Men working at the nuclear plant passed through a checkpoint that was a radiation dosimeter as they came and went. It was so clean and brightly lit, it reminded me of a convenience store – and in fact, there was a convenience store in it. A Lawson.’
starrysteph's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Alcohol, Mental illness, Death of parent, Medical trauma, Body horror, Grief, Miscarriage, Misogyny, Sexual content, Child death, Chronic illness, Infertility, Murder, Suicide attempt, Suicide, Terminal illness, Pandemic/Epidemic, Suicidal thoughts, Ableism, Addiction, Death, Dementia, Forced institutionalization, Panic attacks/disorders, Pregnancy, Violence, Vomit, and War
seherina's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
kateflood's review against another edition
3.0
Graphic: Death of parent, Death, Grief, Suicidal thoughts, and Pregnancy
Moderate: Fire/Fire injury, Sexual content, Violence, Miscarriage, and War