theboldbookworm's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This is a book about the Sylvia Likens case. This book is interesting in that it's part fact, part fiction. The factual part comes mostly from court transcripts as well as some articles that were written about the case. The fiction part comes from the author writing what she thought some of the key players, mostly Sylvia, Gertrude, and Paula were thinking during the entire time from the beginning up to Sylvia's death. If you are interested in the case, this book is worth reading. I will warn you, it is very disturbing as well as heartbreaking.

mythyagain's review

Go to review page

2.0

When I first read this in 1985 I thought it was fantastic. Later after reading more about the case I realized that Kate Millet had been creative with her portrayal of some of the "characters" and the "facts" surrounding the case.

brancrisp's review

Go to review page

challenging dark sad tense medium-paced

4.0

cnidariar3x's review

Go to review page

3.0

Still the most upsetting book I've ever read.

banxehe's review

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective medium-paced

3.0

The nonfiction retelling of the crime is so resonant it almost makes the rest of the book feel less voyeuristic. Almost.

theboldbookworm's review

Go to review page

4.0

This is a book about the Sylvia Likens case. This book is interesting in that it's part fact, part fiction. The factual part comes mostly from court transcripts as well as some articles that were written about the case. The fiction part comes from the author writing what she thought some of the key players, mostly Sylvia, Gertrude, and Paula were thinking during the entire time from the beginning up to Sylvia's death. If you are interested in the case, this book is worth reading. I will warn you, it is very disturbing as well as heartbreaking.
More...